Gravy059

November 2013

Hello, I'm Clpo13. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living person on Rosie O'Donnell, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 00:08, 28 November 2013 (UTC) what the hell is the matter! I have every reference and truth listed!!!!!!!!!!

December 2013

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Rosie O'Donnell. Thank you. | Uncle Milty | talk | 12:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

hello, what do you mean poorly referenced? iv'e go n.j. opra records, the library of congress subject heading, statements on larry kink live, everything you need. so if you made this page to be pretty and untrue, then you've done a great job!!!!

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rosie O'Donnell. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You have yet to supply a link to a reliable source that says anything related to the statements you keep adding. | Uncle Milty | talk | 17:47, 2 December 2013 (UTC) why do you keep threatening to ban me? I have every proof in need. YOU SIR, JUST DON'T WANT TO SEE!!!!!!!

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Rosie O'Donnell, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 18:12, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rosie O'Donnell may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Gravy059. You have new messages at Clpo13's talk page.
Message added 18:46, 2 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

clpo13_(talk) 18:46, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Gravy059, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Gravy059! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

thank yo, I have just spent an hour writing a question to no avail where are they?

Talkback

Hello, Gravy059. You have new messages at Clpo13's talk page.
Message added 16:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

clpo13_(talk) 16:51, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Your vendetta

Stop. No matter how hard you try, you will not be allowed to use Wikipedia as a weapon in your quest to find your child. Yes, I've read your blog, I've read the snippets of your "books" available through Google and Amazon. I get what you are trying to, but this isn't the place. Your attempts to attack the reputation of a person whose bio is here on Wikipedia and to substantiate those attacks using your self-published "books" cannot and will not be allowed to exist here. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 20:08, 3 December 2013 (UTC) Attacking Rosie in a quest to find my child? Sir, for one thing, letting people know that Rosie funded, was affiliated and worked for an adoption agency isn't an assault on her character, moral or not! Information is a helpful guideline for attaining character - moral or not! Also the only reason I even mentioned my book was to substantiate fact from fiction by means of the Library of Congress discrediting "cuteness" and a realizing of what "Children of the World" has accomplished.Gravy059 (talk) 21:00, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you indefinitely because it does not appear that you are here to help build the encyclopedia. Mark Arsten (talk) 21:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)