Joymoon1

A page you started (Trevor Abrahmsohn) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Trevor Abrahmsohn, Glentree1!

Wikipedia editor Ammarpad just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please add inline references to your articles. See Referencing for beginners

To reply, leave a comment on Ammarpad's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

–Ammarpad (talk) 04:54, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Trevor Abrahmsohn

The article Trevor Abrahmsohn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Essentially an advertisement, originally authored by a user with a username indicating COI or paid editing. But, more importantly, the subject simply doesn't appear to meet notability guidelines.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 18:38, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Trevor Abrahmsohn has been accepted

Trevor Abrahmsohn, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

November 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

• Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
• Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. Missvain (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Joymoon1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

joymoon1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Yes, I understand the reason for the block was due to promotional username

Decline reason:

I've renamed your account from Glentree1. However, that's not the only reason for your block; you will need to address your inappropriate edits. Please review WP:COI and WP:PAID. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:59, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Joymoon1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

joymoon1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Yes, I understand that the reason for the block was also due to some promotional edits, I'll not add any promotional content to wikipedia articles

Decline reason:

You forgot to tell us what you'd write about instead. Yamla (talk) 11:56, 21 November 2019 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Joymoon1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

joymoon1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My other contributions would be to famous persons in UK

Decline reason:

Such as Trevor Abrahmsohn? No, thanks. Huon (talk) 21:54, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Trevor Abrahmsohn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trevor Abrahmsohn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trevor Abrahmsohn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Edwardx (talk) 00:24, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joymoon1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

we would contribute towards correcting the grammar of articles

Decline reason:

"We"? Yunshui ^雲_水 12:13, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joymoon1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would contribute towards correcting the grammar of articles, 'we' was a typographical error

Decline reason:

Per below. MER-C 10:08, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is your fifth unblock request. You've manifestly failed to follow the unblock instructions and appear incapable of doing so. Perhaps Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Regardless, I've revoked talk page access to prevent further pointless requests. This leaves you with WP:UTRS if your current request is declined. --Yamla (talk) 12:43, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Confirmed sock

See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/24Mikhail.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:59, 7 January 2020 (UTC)