Vandalism warning edit

Please do not delete well-sourced statements, as you did with Ernest Bevin‎, If you think the statement is wrong you will need to ADD your information from a reliable secondary source. And don't call famous books "rubbish" -- it degrades your credibility. Rjensen (talk) 23:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Alan Bullock was a Labour peer so his biography of Bevin was clearly biased. (GeorgeJefferys (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC))Reply

GeorgeJefferys, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi GeorgeJefferys! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Do go there. SaintAviator lets talk 04:39, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GeorgeJefferys, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Valenciano (talk) 21:27, 23 February 2015 (UTC)Reply