User talk:Francewhoa/Archived 2020

Latest comment: 3 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

March 2020 edit

Serious WP:BLP matter edit

You recently added content to a biographical article (including its lead section), and to its talk page, directly stating that a living person had been indicted on criminal charges. In fact, the citations you reference make clear that the individual was the prosecutor in the case, not the defendant. I had to deletion these revisions because of this serious breach of our policy on Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons (BLP). Before you make any further edits to this encyclopedia, I want you to confirm, on this talk page, that you have read BLP and will commit to much more careful editing in the future, particularly on BLP matters. Neutralitytalk 22:40, 6 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


Hello @Neutrality: Thanks for both your message and Wikipedia contributions :) As you know I'm a Wikipedia volunteer contributor like you. Yup I already read BLP. And I am still happy to make my best efforts to remain within it.
My bad about this edit. This was a good faith typo with the name. To resolve my typo:
1. I first updated with the correct name. It needs to read "Charles K. Edwards". Instead of "Brian A. Benczkowski".
2. Then I moved the remaining of the information as is into this other Wikipedia article about the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General. Difference between revisions. Then adapted it accordingly.
With infinite Wikipedia love ♥. Francewhoa (talk) 02:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dear @Neutrality: :) Before you make any further edits to this encyclopedia, including but not limited to this talk page, here are two suggested questions for you:
1. Could you please reply here on this talk page to confirm that you are aware of this Wikipedia's AGF standard & fundamental principle, and that you read it?
1. Could you please reply here on this talk page to confirm that you are interested to continue to commit to Wikipedia's AGF?
With infinite Wikipedia love ♥.
This is a note to myself, for future easy reference, this is the archived present AGF Francewhoa (talk) 02:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


May 2020 edit

You violated the WP:1RR restriction on Antifa (United States). [1], [2] I strongly suggest that you self-rvt. Also, the discussion is at: [3] O3000 (talk) 21:42, 31 May 2020 (UTC)Reply


June 2020 edit

Anitifa edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

SPECIFICO talk 01:47, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


Discretionary sanctions edit

Continued edits such as the above could lead you to being banned from the entire topic area, including discususion pages. Doug Weller talk 10:36, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply


November 2020 edit

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply