Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Frame1983. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  01:09, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Howard Nuk edit

 

The article Howard Nuk has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Right now, this BLP is basically unsourced. This person has the potential to be WP:N but the only source right now doesn't even mention him. There needs to be separate coverage of him as a person in WP:RS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. shoy (reactions) 15:05, 17 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Dennis Miloseski edit

Thanks for creating Dennis Miloseski.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

This article needs more citations to independent, significant coverage of the subject to meet notability guidelines. Currently, most of the cited coverage is interviews where Miloseski talks about Palm, but there's very little about Miloseski himself.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 22:55, 16 December 2018 (UTC)Reply