Foleo

Welcome!

Hello, Foleo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 00:06, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

April 2014

I reverted your edit to Operation Wrath of God for playing with the quotes, removing quotations and adding scare quotes like you did to Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories. Please keep in mind minor edits can have a major affect on article tone. Thank you, Origamite^{Please talk here} 21:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Discrimination against atheists, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 05:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Regensburg lecture

Please avoid using wp:weasel wording. Not that I disagree with you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:42, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

)

August 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

• Note that this block is also for block evasion. See Special:Contributions/72.198.49.108. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:31, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

I wish to appeal the block because IP was independent but I did believe that I was "sticking up" for him based on what I saw him/her do. Again, I apologize for the wrong I may have done. That was not me who did the edit warring however as it was someone using it in my name. Please unblock me and I promise not to bother you or anyone again with frivolous edits and keep an eye on my edits as well and not to get dragged into a conflict that could have easily been avoided if I had not assumed negatively. It was a mistake on my part and I apologize for it. Foleo (talk) 02:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

I just misunderstood the intentions of the editor I was complaining about. I promise to be more patient and understanding in the future, Mister/Mrs User: BU Rob13. Foleo (talk) 02:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

• You've already been told how to appeal the block to an uninvolved administrator. There are instructions in the pink box, please follow them. Bishonen | talk 02:09, 4 August 2016 (UTC).

As I said before, the block is not necessary as was just doing edits in good faith. I promise not to step out of line next time. Please unblock me as soon as possible. Thank you, from Foleo (talk) 02:30, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Check this WP:EBUR--Yufitran (talk) 16:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

@Yufitran: Your account is one day old. You found this- and that- page, how exactly...? _Muffled ^Pocketed 18:38, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

• cough*sockpuppet*cough* --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:49, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

It's magic ;)Is there no greeting for me ?

I found his contribution in this page yesterday--Yufitran (talk) 18:55, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

@Kansas Bear:Wait a second! - You got me!--Yufitran (talk) 19:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

)

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Foleo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"I have no intention of surrendering to User:BU Rob13 and his unproven lies and attacks against me. And so do you Opabinia regalis (talk). I have decided to appeal this block as this harassment will not be tolerated. I have put up with enough of this enslavement to last me a lifetime. If you and your friend refuse to resolve this issue in a civil manner, then I might have no other choice but to appeal to an inpartial administrator to block you both as well. Please don't make me do that. This is my final warning: I was and am willing to discuss this issue on your terms: so remember to take it or leave it. I am causing no disruption whatsoever and if I did then it is unintended and as I am human, you have to let me know: otherwise you and me won't be able to work together to correct this mistake." Foleo (talk) 6:50 pm, Today (UTC−5)'Katie^talk 01:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Nowhere in this statement do you address the reasons you were blocked. There is no comparison between editing this encyclopedia and enslavement. I assure you I am an impartial administrator, and as long as you are belligerent in this manner, you will remain blocked. Katie^talk 01:52, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Foleo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

There is no evidence against me whatsoever. I have I stated lots of times that if given the chance, I will follow Wikipedia rules and policies. Please give me a chance to prove myself worthy of being an editor again and I will not dissapoint you. You cannot assume I am a bad person, just misunderstood. If you test me then I will not fail you. I give you my word. And if I make a mistake on my part then please let me know in a convenient way and I will do what I can to come to terms with you. I am willing to discuss the terms of my unblock and promise to not cause any more unintended disruption.~~~~

Decline reason:

Firstly, please do not remove decline unblock requests before the block is resolved. Secondly, there's ample behavioural evidence against you. You had plenty of chances, you just didn't use them. Huon (talk) 14:54, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Foleo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #16424 was submitted on Aug 26, 2016 20:40:45. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 20:40, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Foleo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Foleo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #19031 was submitted on Aug 20, 2017 17:45:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)