November 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at November 12. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 22:45, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply


Per the definition of "vandalism", my edit was not vandalism and would not subject me to blocking. Maybe have a sense of humor about it. I've corrected numerous errors in other pages under this username and others. This is a fun edit that people will like. Also, it appears you use a boiler plate response to people. How about engaging in useful conversation. Isn't that one of the main goals of Wikipedia?.... increased communications? Nclesen (talk) 23:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes it was "funny" (I've seen the Back to Future trilogy like 10 times, one of my favorites, so I knew what it was referencing without even looking at any of the links) but that page is for real life events, not plots of movies. TomCat4680 (talk) 08:03, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2016 World Series, you may be blocked from editing. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:06, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Its not disruptive editing. Not only is it factual, but relevant to the historic event. Just because you think its not, doesnt make you right. I will be adding my edit back. If you delete it, I will report you for abuse and YOU will be blocked from editing.

If you want to compare educations or baseball knowledge, please name the time and place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.77.206.131 (talk) 20:31, 12 January 2018 (UTC)Reply