Finesselaw

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sinie Caliber (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sinie Caliber and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 09:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Finesselaw! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 09:51, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024

Hello Finesselaw. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Finesselaw. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Finesselaw|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

I am not directly or indirectly compensated for any edits. Also, my employer is the United States Small Business Administration hired to combat fraud with the United States Department of Justice. Finesselaw (talk) 10:00, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

You are claiming this image, which is clearly professionally taken, as your own personal work. Please clarify your relationship with Ms. Caliber. 331dot (talk) 10:02, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Found on a album release page; I have submitted an article to academia for her recent cases as she is not just a musician but has a few civil rights cases. I have been following her on social media and this young lady deserves notoriety for the work she is doing within the community. Finesselaw (talk) 10:14, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Also, there is not many musicians who are actual lawyers. She deserves to be know about. Finesselaw (talk) 10:16, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

If you did not personally take the image, you cannot claim it as your own work. Doing so puts this entire project at risk. You must immediately go to Commons and either 1) request deletion of the image or 2) if the image was posted with a copyright that is compatible with Wikipedia's(allowing for reuse for any purpose with attribution), provide the proper copyright and attribution. If a specific copyright is not given, you must assume that it is not compatible.

Images are not relevant to the draft submission process, which only considers the text and sources. Images can wait until the draft is accepted and placed in the encyclopedia.

What someone deserves is not relevant to their meriting a Wikipedia article, no matter how good what they are doing is. Your draft is sourced to nothing but her website and Twitter/X. Wikipedia is not a place to merely tell about someone and their accomplishments or good works. A Wikipedia article about a person must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about a person, showing how they meet the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person. We don't want to know what they say about themselves, but what others completely unconnected with them choose on their own to say about them. If she is notable(the term we use, not "notoriety" which often has a negative connotation) for the fact that she is a lawyer and has a music career at the same time, we need independent sources that discuss that about her. Please see Your First Article. If you just want to tell the world about her and her work, that's exactly what social media is for. 331dot (talk) 10:21, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Okay, I understand; however, this young lady has over 2,000 articles written about her from people, authors, universities all around the world; do I need to reference each one and each case she is currently working on, the photo is within copyright that is compatible. This may take a while so I will work on gathering the article information such as known authors, scientists, universities, and film. Her album is set to release on February 9, 2024; for chart information I am not sure but I am pretty sure she will be listed on music communities around the world as she is already discussed but not on social media more like political communities. Thank you for explaining, I will do further research. Finesselaw (talk) 10:31, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

You don't need to write a complete summary of every source available or otherwise provide every source available. To pass the draft submission process, most reviewers look for three independent reliable sources with significant coverage to be summarized. These cannot be interviews, press releases, announcements of routine activities, or primary sources. You may find reading Your First Article helpful, and possibly the new user tutorial. Writing a new article is probably the most difficult task to attempt on Wikipedia; though diving right in is possible, we usually recommend gaining experience and knowledge of how we do things first, including first editing existing articles. 331dot (talk) 10:48, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Will do further research, thank you for the insight. Finesselaw (talk) 10:56, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sinie Caliber (June 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Qcne (talk) 15:54, 21 June 2024 (UTC)