User talk:Fehufanga/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Frank D Hargrove

Curious to know when you asked him about all these opinions? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mooohargrove (talk • contribs) 03:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

@Mooohargrove: I reverted your edit because of this sentence: "He was the politician we want to see right now, but cannot find". This is an opinion, and thus not pertaining to a neutral POV. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 03:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2021

• From the editor: Different stories, same place

• News and notes: The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded

• In the media: China bans, and is there intelligent life on this planet?

• Opinion: A photo on Wikipedia can ruin your life

• Discussion report: Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process

• Recent research: Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention

• Community view: Reflections on the Chinese Wikipedia

• Traffic report: James Bond and the Giant Squid Game

• Technology report: Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more

• Serendipity: How Wikipedia helped create a Serbian stamp

• Book review: Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality

• WikiProject report: Redirection

• Humour: A very Wiki crossword

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021

• In the media: Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography

• WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2021

• Deletion report: What we lost, what we gained

• From a Wikipedia reader: What's Matt Amodio?

• Arbitration report: ArbCom in 2021

• Discussion report: On the brink of change – RFA reforms appear imminent

• Technology report: What does it take to upload a file?

• WikiProject report: Interview with contributors to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers

• Serendipity: "Did You Know ..." featured a photo of the wrong female WWII pilot

• News from Diff: Content translation tool helps create one million Wikipedia articles

• Traffic report: Reporting ticket sales on the edge of the Wiki, if Eternals should fail

• Recent research: Vandalizing Wikipedia as rational behavior

• Humour: A very new very Wiki crossword

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2021

• From the editor: Here is the news

• News and notes: Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements

• Serendipity: Born three months before her brother?

• In the media: The past is not even past

• Recent research: STEM articles judged unsuitable for undergraduates below the first paragraph

• Arbitration report: A new crew for '22

• By the numbers: Four billion words and a few numbers

• Deletion report: We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"

• Gallery: Wikicommons presents: 2021

• Traffic report: Spider-Man, football and the departed

• Crossword: Another Wiki crossword for one and all

• Humour: Buying Wikipedia

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:07, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022

• Special report: WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment

• News and notes: Feedback for Board of Trustees election

• Interview: CEO Maryana Iskander "four weeks in"

• Black History Month: What are you doing for Black History Month?

• Deletion report: Ringing in the new year: Subject notability guideline under discussion

• WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured

• Arbitration report: New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions

• Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2021

• Gallery: No Spanish municipality without a photograph

• Obituary: Twofingered Typist

• Op-Ed: Identifying and rooting out climate change denial

• Essay: The prime directive

• Opinion: Should the Wikimedia Foundation continue to accept cryptocurrency donations?

• In the media: Fuzzy-headed government editing

• Recent research: Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"

• Serendipity: Pooh entered the Public Domain – but Tigger has to wait two more years

• Crossword: Cross swords with a crossword

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari

 I invite you to please join the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari.

Hello, we are seeking help with the Sarah Azhari article, created in 2013 & recently the subject of a deletion proposal. At issue was whether or not the Indonesian language sources establish notability. I am inviting you to the discussion at Talk:Sarah Azhari#Help with Indonesian language sources because you are in the Category:User id-N & have a minimum of 1,000 edits across all Wikimedia projects.

I realize that some of you are very busy while others may no longer be editing. Nevertheless, I thought it wise to consult with you.

Thank your for the work that you do on Wiki[mp]edia! Peaceray (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Death on the Nile

I was shocked your site cannot take hard facts. NOTHING i posted was incorrect. IT is a British film that the cast was GOD AWFUL not by a few viewers but the reviews in 19 critics reviews. But hey . facts are not going to be posted on here. then what the site for? Propaganda. We got plenty of that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.9.168.6 (talk) 23:59, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Please read WP:NPOV. Saying that the movie is bad is an opinion of yours. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 00:02, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

No saying the cast is bad is the worlds critics complaints. movies was great before they hacked it. THAT is an opinion. 172.9.168.6 (talk) 00:04, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

1. You placed an opinion in the "Plot" section, where it doesn't belong, 2. You could've worded it in a better way, and not use the words "God awful", and 3. If those are the opinions of critics, then cite those critics, because opinions must be attributed. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 00:07, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

What sinks "Death on the Nile" ... isn't even the backstory surrounding Hercule Poirot's mustache, no matter how silly that collection of words is. It's that the ensemble here — perhaps excluding Branagh and Bateman, and only in a couple of scenes — are working very hard at giving very bad performances indeed.

https://www.cinemablend.com/movies/death-on-the-nile-reviews-are-online-heres-what-critics-are-saying-about-the-kenneth-branagh-sequel

No matter how you hide it . I was correct . HUNDREDS of reviews. 172.9.168.6 (talk) 00:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Feel free to move it in the "Receptions" section and add proper citations to it. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 00:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

and use a better wording, instead of "god awful". --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 00:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

Singlet oxygen

I was recently on the singlet page and it dates 1 of the states of singlet is 1🔺G. It states 1 is dipole measure spin gravity.

This is wrong though if u refer to the quantum state of oxygen ur looking at 1 🔺g which is 1 dimensional gravity particle w no spin & no measurement other then a faint Planck measure which is same as the permeability or permiality electric or magnet ur enenuating by this article it’s radiation so it’s not a gravity particle and the g should be removed it’s a B flux sign 🪧 state

I look forward to ur response for clarification for my own edification as my understanding of this subject could be wrong

Thank you Alphamuon702 (talk) 23:19, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Alphamuon702: Hello. I appreciate that you have reached out to me. I must apologize first, because my understanding of chemistry is limited to what I learned in high school, so I can't make any comments about spectroscopic notation. However, I undid your edit because you seemed to be talking in the article, that is, writing about how a sentence is incorrect. Feel free to make a question at the Science reference desk - Somebody there who understands chemistry better than me might be able to answer you. Thank you for understanding. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 23:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

Thank you 👍 Alphamuon702 (talk) 01:29, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

ENjoy

Why did u remove meh edit? Watercolour1234 (talk) 21:40, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

@Watercolour1234: Hello. Thanks for reaching out. Your edits seemed unhelpful to the article, that is why I removed it. If you want to make editing tests, feel free to head over to WP:Sandbox or User:Watercolour1234/sandbox. Thank you. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 21:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Rollback

Hi Fehufanga. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or RedWarn.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! FASTILY 22:42, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Alright. Thank you very much. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 22:59, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Removed my Edit

Hi Fehufanga, you just removed my edit. I was trying to add my link under the notes and reference section and I think my link is just as relevant as the two that are already in this section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyK63 (talk • contribs) 03:56, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

@AndyK63: Hello. Thank you for reaching out to me. I noticed that the link was more of a product page, and it seemed promotional. Per WP:PROMO, I reverted your edit. If you'd like, you can explain how the link is useful here. I will reconsider it. Thanks. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 04:03, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Under the notes and reference section, Item 1 is a link for a product that is no longer available and the link is broken, Item 2 is a link directly to a product datasheet. I was trying to add a third link to our "solutions" page on leak noise correlators". This page explains a little about how leak noise correlators work, has a link to a useful technical paper on leak detection and has links to our products. I certainly think what I was trying to add has more value than what is already there on points 1 and 2. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyK63 (talk • contribs)

@AndyK63: The second link seems to be promotional as well. The first one is archived by the Wayback Machine, and may have some merit as a reference. If there is a direct link to the technical paper you referred to, it might be better to link directly there. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 05:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

I have changed the link to the technical paper as you suggested. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndyK63 (talk • contribs) 05:43, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

Trout

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

--*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 22:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

False Credits

Hey you just left a note on my talk page 1 second after I reverted vandalism, claiming you had reverted an edit because it wasn’t a constructive edit. In reality you did no such thing. I removed the unconstructive edit. You didn’t. There’s a lot of arrogant wikipedians and also some claiming credit for things they don’t do. 12.174.49.50 (talk) 23:00, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

@12.174.49.50: Hello. If you are using a shared IP address, then consider registering an account. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 23:02, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

And @Fehufanga what does that have to do with someone here claiming to have fixed a problem they didn’t? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.174.49.50 (talk) 23:09, 17 February 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For helping with the botnet spam. Sea Cow (talk) 00:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Sea Cow (talk) 00:52, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

bruh

I would like you to put my edits back in plz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elias Boyd (talk • contribs) 23:00, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

@Elias Boyd: The link which you added does not fit the subject of the section, and generally, external links like those are avoided. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 23:33, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Not right

Your decision was not right.

--2001:56B:BCB6:ED00:A9CB:A514:F1E1:3CCB (talk) 00:38, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 February 2022

• From the team: Selection of a new Signpost Editor-in-Chief

• News and notes: Impacts of Russian invasion of Ukraine

• Opinion: Why student editors are good for Wikipedia

• Special report: A presidential candidate's team takes on Wikipedia

• In the media: Wiki-drama in the UK House of Commons

• Serendipity: War photographers: from Crimea (1850s) to the Russian invasion of Ukraine (2022)

• Technology report: Community Wishlist Survey results

• WikiProject report: 10 years of tea

• Featured content: Featured Content returns

• Deletion report: The 10 most SHOCKING deletion discussions of February

• Recent research: How editors and readers may be emotionally affected by disasters and terrorist attacks

• Arbitration report: Parties remonstrate, arbs contemplate, skeptics coordinate

• By the numbers: Does birthplace affect the frequency of Wikipedia biography articles?

• Gallery: The vintage exhibit

• Traffic report: Euphoria, Pamela Anderson, lies and Netflix

• News from Diff: The Wikimania 2022 Core Organizing Team

• Crossword: A Crossword, featuring Featured Articles

• Humour: Notability of mailboxes

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Praise

This is your only notice, if you revert vandalism before I do again, you may be awarded barnstars without further notice.

You are so darn fast! I know how you do it though (Huggle). :P InterstateFive (talk) - just another roadgeek 00:41, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Huggle is great, but it keeps logging me out for no reason. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 00:42, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 49

The Wikipedia Library

Books & Bytes
Issue 49, January – February 2022

• New library collections
• Blog post published detailing technical improvements

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --10:06, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 March 2022

• From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine

• News and notes: Of safety and anonymity

• Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera

• Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary

• Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps

• Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks

• In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff

• Recent research: Top scholarly citers, lack of open access references, predicting editor departures

• Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond

• Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now

• Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon

• Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors

• Traffic report: War, what is it good for?

• Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine

• Gallery: "All we are saying is, give peace a chance..."

• From the archives: Burn, baby burn

• Essay: Yes, the sky is blue

• Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja

• On the bright side: The bright side of news

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:49, 27 March 2022 (UTC)

Thanks!

Fehufanga, Thank you for your help.178.148.119.189 (talk) 08:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

No problem. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page ♮ 08:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)}  If you reply here, please ping me by using {{re|Ks0stm}} in your reply.  13:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)

Teyora - Development first look!

Hi! I'm Ed6767, the original creator of RedWarn, now one of the most popular tools on the English Wikipedia that's been used by over 1,000 Wikimedians to make over 300,000 edits since mid-2020 that's been praised for its user friendliness and ease of use, but criticised for its limited functionality. I'm leaving this message as I think it may be of interest here - I left the RedWarn project in November to develop Teyora, my successor to RedWarn (alongside Chlod's UltraViolet). It's a new in development web app that uses some of the latest web technologies to create a highly extendable all in one editing tool with a focus on administration, counter vandalism and general patrolling - not to mention, it'll work on every Wikimedia project without any prior configuration and can be used by any user with at least auto-confirmed rights*. Now, I'm ready to give the Wikimedia community a first look at what I've been doing over the past six months and what to expect going forward.

You can check out the 20 minute first look at the in development version on YouTube here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzlpnzXdLP4.

There's lots more to expect too! Why not read the full details page at meta:Teyora and leave any feedback, comments or wishes at meta:Talk:Teyora (please leave any correspondence there to keep discussion centralised). If you're interested, you can leave your signature

*with basic features, advanced features require configuration. To prevent abuse, auto-confirmed users will be in a restricted mode until approved by an admin or via rollback rights.

All the best, ✨ Ed talk! ✨ 23:11, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

remove the link

Why do you remove the link ? its a Ngo and I added the information and the Wikipedia page for reference https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_non-governmental_organisations_in_India — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asdfassaa (talk • contribs) 12:36, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

@Asdfassaa That appears to be a mistake on my part. You may revert my edit. --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 12:44, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2022

• News and notes: Double trouble

• In the media: The battlegrounds outside and inside Wikipedia

• Special report: Ukrainian Wikimedians during the war

• Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary (Part 2)

• Technology report: 8-year-old attribution issues in Media Viewer

• Featured content: Wikipedia's best content from March

• In focus: Editing difficulties on Russian Wikipedia

• Gallery: A voyage around the world with WLM winners

• Interview: On a war and a map

• Serendipity: Wikipedia loves photographs, but hates photographers

• Traffic report: Justice Jackson, the Smiths, and an invasion

• Recent research: Student edits as "civic engagement"; how Wikipedia readers interact with images

• News from the WMF: How Smart is the SMART Copyright Act?

• Essay: The problem with elegant variation

• Humour: Really huge message boxes

• From the archives: Wales resigned WMF board chair in 2006 reorganization

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

incorrect edit

my edit was not incorrect you are. i have my doctorate in editing wikipedia and i am smarter than you. you do not have any degrees in any thing and i have 12 in every thing. so put my edit back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8800:8827:3200:3020:8112:70C2:8F73 (talk) 00:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Hello, how is adding a nonconstructive message on an articl relevant with you having a doctorate? --*Fehufangą ♮ ✉ Talk page 01:00, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Human sexuality

@2607:fea8:1d20:5605:8477:f301:d693:81a0: deleted this section in large part because it is poorly sourced and highly biased I agree it shouldn't all be deleted but it is in serious need of revision--Tjpolega (talk) 17:29, 14 May 2022 (UTC)

@Tjpolega Hi! I reverted their edit because their removal wasn't explained adequately (the edit summary was jj), but if you were able to make corrections to it, that's great! --*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 04:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Untitled message from Asdfassaa

hello sir why did you removed created article Asdfassaa (talk) 09:35, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

@Asdfassaa: Hi, I am not an admin, I don't have the ability to delete pages. I did not tag the page for deletion either. You will need to ask an admin for assistance regarding page deletions. Thank you.--*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 14:00, 17 May 2022 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For your swift actions in keeping vandals away. Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 11:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

@Volten001 thank you for the barnstar! I appreciate it. --*Fehufangą (✉ Talk · ✎ Contribs) 12:03, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Most welcome and happy editing Volten001 ^☎ 12:08, 19 May 2022 (UTC)