Esoser1

Esoser1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Esoser1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scattering CJ (April 21)

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CommanderWaterford was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scattering CJ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Scattering CJ, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:58, 21 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scattering CJ has been accepted

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Scattering CJ, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 04:48, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Esoser1. I just had some feedback regarding your very large and complicated edit to List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events, which I have reverted. This article is a Featured List. Which means it's been peer reviewed and accepted as one of Wikipedia's best pieces of content. While being bold is often encouraged, in this case as so many people have contributed to this article and agreed on the current formatting (which allowed it to become one of Wikipedia's best lists), it's not a good idea to make considerable changes to the article without obtaining consensus on the talk page first. You've also made a lot of very confusing changes and formatting errors, such as replacing the accepted reference parameter "url-status=" with the disused parameter "deadurl=". You can see your edit in the edit history of the article here: [1]. Scroll down to the reference section and have a look at all the red error messages that are a direct result of your edit. Also confusing is your desire to remove referenced information, again without obtaining any form of consensus first, your desire to remove archived links and your choice to add in unused parameters to references and more complicated URLs. Some of your individual changes do look like they may have been constructive, however, as you'd made an absolutely overwhelming number of changes at once it's simply too time-consuming to go through them all and try and see what ones are salvageable. I'd recommend not making so many changes at once in the future to any article, unless it's an article that has no other regular or involved contributors. You've clearly put a lot of effort into the change you made, and I'd hate to see so much of your time wasted again in the future. So I'd recommend not making major edits to featured content at all until you're more experienced at editing, I'd recommend not making major changes to popular articles without first obtaining consensus, and I'd also recommend making less changes at once so you can explain all the various changes you're making with the edit summary. Have a nice day. Damien Linnane (talk) 15:20, 30 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scattering CJ (film) (June 27)

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Avoid, for example Hallie's request resonated beyond her wildest expectations.[4] It galvanized a global community via social media that would scatter CJ’s ashes in thousands of different locations, creating a vast archive of imagery and moving personal testimony.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scattering CJ (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Scattering CJ (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic