User talk:Ericorbit/Archive13

Taylor Dayne

You're right, I meant to unprotect that. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. howcheng {chat} 00:22, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Weezer

You mean that the weekly chart highlights on Radio and Records/Billboard doesn't help? It shows that Pork and Beans is at number 1 on the Alternative/Modern Rock charts. {BravesFan2006} 02:11 PM, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Another question I have the page where I said Weezer was number one. Can I repost my article on Wednesday afternoon when Billboard publishes its chart? Also if you can, you could help me with the succession box. {BravesFan2006} 02:26 PM, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Hard Candy possible single

I actually bought the album myself, so thats how i know about the possible single. I dont know how i can possibly cite that, though. I am well aware of the Wikipedia guidelines, just so you know. - JJVrocks (talk) 01:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Boom Boom

Hey there, I have a favor to ask, and you seemed like the logical choice for this, based on your extensive knowledge of dance music. A while back I created a page for the Paul Lekakis song, "Boom Boom (Let's Go Back to My Room)", since it's probably his best-known song, and one I remember fondly. Since then the page has been tagged for no references or sources. When I created it, I used info from the artist page as well as some info I got from various websites, which I didn't cite (and don't remember), but I believe most of what I posted is true. My question: do you have any sources that could verify this info, and if so would you mind doing so? I'm thinking specifically of the Billboard Hot Dance/Disco book, which I don't have, and I thought you might. Earlier tonight I added a link to the #1 Australian songs of the 80s, but any help you could give that page would be appreciated. Thanks. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 01:22, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

I figured you had that book, I want to get it too. I've added some things to that article, but one part I'm unsure about is if it didn't hit the Club Play chart when it first came out. Maybe there's a note about that somewhere in the book? Anyway, thanks in advance, man! Zephyrnthesky (talk) 01:16, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Just thought I'd let you know that I found a couple of references for this song and it's pop chart peak positions in the US, UK and Australia. I kind of had to teach myself how to do this today, meaning citing references and all that, and I hope I got it right. Were you ever able to check the Whitburn Dance book and see if anything is listed about this song? I gotta get that book someday... Zephyrnthesky (talk) 18:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm sure it will turn up. I appreciate you checking that out and for the suggestions (I remember not being sure whether it would be Lekakis's or Lekakis' when I created the page, so I just used Paul's instead). So just now when I changed those, first I went to the apostrophe page here on wikipedia, and I still couldn't figure it out, so I just guessed. But using his last name does seem less informal. I've been busying myself in Hot Adult Contemporary-land lately, instead of randomly picking dance songs and adding links, so I'll check back sometime later. Thanks again dude :-) Zephyrnthesky (talk) 21:04, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cyndi Lauper Essential.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cyndi Lauper Essential.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

RE:User Page

I don't understand why it can't go back to 106 & Park. Other Bot's didn't care, they fixed links and everything. And as I was sayng before I see things like that in an encyclopedia. So, please let me add it and keep it to 106 & Park please.

---Piazzajordan2 01:26, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Again

Please, I am helping out a lot of Wikipedian's. Can you please just forget about it, and let me slide. In the nicest way possible I am asking you, please.

---Piazzajordan2 22:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Billboard 200

I am disappointed that you reverted something I put on the Billboard 200 page. I consider myself to be a serious writer of content, not a troll. I checked my Talk and User pages, as well as the discussion for that page, but I found no explanation. I will put this back over the weekend if I don't get feedback by then. RSLitman (talk) 02:59, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Would you kindly review the discussion here? Number-one albums of 1963 (USA) I made a correction earlier and someone else undid it. I have never redone any reversed corrections, so I'd like your opinion on it. It appears that this user may not be a chart expert and therefore shouldn't be undoing these changes. What is your opinion? Petepait (talk) 05:03, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:A-ha Take on Me.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:A-ha Take on Me.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:03, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

..

why can't you just leave it there, and not mess with it?

---Piazzajordan2 23:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

1000th number one of the rock era

Hi Eric

Take A Bow is the 998th number one of the rock era using the same chronology used by Fred Bronson in his books. This means the 1000th will occur shortly...

These were the previous century number ones:

100	Nov 6, 1961	Big Bad John                    Jimmy Dean
200	Jun 11, 1966	Paint It, Black	                The Rolling Stones
300	Oct 2, 1971	Maggie May	                Rod Stewart
400	Apr 5, 1975	Lovin' You	                Minnie Riperton
500	Apr 14, 1979	What A Fool Believes	        The Doobie Brothers
600	Dec 22, 1984	Like A Virgin	                Madonna
700	Jun 18, 1988	Together Forever	        Rick Astley
800	Nov 30, 1991	Set Adrift On Memory Bliss	PM Dawn
900	Jul 29, 2000	It's Gonna Be Me	        N Sync

Phildav76 (talk) 23:10, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:

I'm going by this listing. Is it in error? Chubbles (talk) 16:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Shirley Bassey

Could I ask you to cast a critical eye on this article. In recent times, a relatively new user, Yesmissy, has been making a string of edits. I feel they are in danger of turning a half-decent Wikipedia article into a fansite; with POV, incorrect formatting, excessive use of bold type, and completely unsourced, biased comments creeping in throughout. It is not vandalism as such, but I think it is downgrading the whole article. However this is purely my view - (POV) again. Your second opinion would be much appreciated. Many thanks again,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 18:32, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Bananarama Master Series.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bananarama Master Series.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 19:57, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Forums

As you probably know, the ukmix forums are constantly used as a source for sales. I've made a proposal here about blacklisting it. Just thought you might be interested. Spellcast (talk) 19:14, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Just so you know, I've added it to the blacklist. It should slowly but surely be phased out. Spellcast (talk) 00:35, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Madonna//Give It 2 Me

Hey, could you please take a look at User:JoFerg. He or she continues to upload a fanmade cd cover for the single, yet the link he or she provides as a source clearly states that its fanmade. This is the 3rd or 4th time I've marked the exact image for deletion. Alkclark (talk) 17:50, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Sources for Yazoo

Hello, I'm trying to fully reference the Yazoo article. Do you happen to have the sources you used for adding some of the information? I would most appreciate it if you could add some formatted citations like I have done. Thanks! — Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 07:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

B-52's

Hi, thanks for adding that tour info, do you have a citation for it? I've been putting in refs for this article over the past month trying to get it to pass "B" standard for the Georgia project, and they keep giving grief about not enough references. Every unreferenced addition is one more that someone else will have to track down. Rep07 (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

potentially controversial edit?

Michael Jackson's " Thriller" LP Has sold the most units of all-time. Thats common Knowledge. How is that in anyway controversial? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.232.153.118 (talk) 15:58, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

In response to the changing of genres

I added the electropop genre to Kiss Kiss and Clumsy because Chris Brown's and Fergie's voices are electronically enhanced in certain parts of the song!--Seán Travers (talk) 08:42, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Seán Travers

Cyndi Lauper

So are you saying that if it's not posted on the Internet then it doesn't count? Billboard for instance does not list its entire charts on-line. I can't use a printed source? I have the Early Edition Club Play charts but Billboard doesn't list them all on-line. Confused. Citations from non-Internet sources should be legitimate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chael39 (talk • contribs) 20:02, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Hot100Brasil

Can you please help me remove all the Hot100Brasil chart positions from the various song articles to which they've been added? Thanks. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:22, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of United World Chart

An article that you have been involved in editing, United World Chart, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United World Chart. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tosqueira (talk) 07:20, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones

Why did you revert my recent edit? The Bookkeeper (of the Occult) 07:05, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Sticky & Sweet Tour

Hi, could you please take a look at Crackers2007 and his/her making edits to Sticky & Sweet Tour. He/She continues to add dates for Mexico, Brazil and Montenegro. The first time, he/she claimed that Madonna announced that dates on a Mexican talk show the 2nd+ times after, he/she provided a link to a site that doesn't mentioned Madonna. More recently, he/she claims that Live Nation announced the dates in a press release. I have contacted Live Nation and they have stated that there are no dates for Mexico or South America but they are in talks. I have warned him/her on their talk page but they deleted my comments. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dancefloor royalty (talk • contribs) 16:19, 10 June 2008 (UTC)

Mariah Carey chart disagreement

Asking a favor here. You seem like the right editor for this, considering the nature of the disagreement, and your longtime caretaking role on the "Billboard achievements/milestones" page.

The dispute is about appropriate (or inappropriate) credit for lead/featured artists. You can pick up the particulars on the Mariah Carey edit history:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mariah_Carey&action=history

And on my Talk page:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:One_Sweet_Edit&redirect=no

Any direction or expertise you could share would be appreciated. And if you don't have time or interest for this, that's okay too. Thanks!One Sweet Edit (talk) 17:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

Your timely intervention was like the cavalry that sadly never came for Mr. Custer in Larry Verne's 1960 chart-topper, and is much appreciated!One Sweet Edit (talk) 14:48, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

I still can't believe

I am trying to be nice, i want to help out a lot this summer on Wikipedia. Everyone wants the New Joints & New Entries category on the 106 & Park category. Please let it stay.

--Piazzajordan2 05:05, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

I honestly don't feel like it's vandalism. I am helping out Wikipedia.

--Piazzajordan2 05:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

You are!

Look you revert everything i do! Okay, tell me why?

--Piazzajordan2 20:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi

Though I didn't add any more minor charts/component charts, you keep reverting all my edits. This severely distresses me because I'm doing what WP:CHARTS observes. Also, even when I add the correct chart names, you revert the changes back to inaccurate names. 216.221.109.89 (talk) 20:07, 18 June 2008 (UTC) Also, Lativa, and Lithuania do not have official national singles charts, they have only Airplay Charts.216.221.109.89 (talk) 20:13, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

O.K. I see now, thanks for the clarifications. Do you happen to know why Billboard gives incorrect info for various countries charts, as in their chart search system, the info is 99% of the time innaccurate. (Belgium, Italy, Ireland, Sweden, Netherlands, Norway)216.221.109.89 (talk) 20:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Juliet of the Spirits (song)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Juliet of the Spirits (song), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juliet of the Spirits (song). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Mdsummermsw (talk) 17:56, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi, I know exactly what you're talking about and I have cited sources and I have clearly stated these are rumours. I'm familiar with wikipedia and there's no rule agains posting rumours based on good sources as long as they are properly cited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Denisxavier (talk • contribs) 18:28, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Disruptive user

After weeks of reverting, or page blanking at Viva la Vida, Violet Hill, and Coldplay discography, by User:Atlantik (talk|contribs), it still does not relent. His most recent edits have been comprised of sneaky, non-summarized[1], or vaguely and simplistically summarized reverting of my own valid edits, and as well as blind non-caring reversions of not only my edits, but in some cases, many users [2], or even dozens of users' edits([3])... As well as he has sneakily removed a warning I gave him ([4]) One edit has him simply stating "Trivia", as if to imply he was removing trivia, but clearly he was removing more than that: ([5]) Also he reverted this with no edit summary, and later made a highly hypocritical edit re-adding information I had removed due it being content exceeding the chart limit mentioned at WP:CHARTS, which shows he clearly is only out to revert my edits, otherwise if I had added them he would have reverted me anyway. Also, I do observe WP:CHARTS in my editing, but still Atlantik persists in sneakily reverting my changes, and again not including a summary of his edit.[6]

I know that he himself knows of the chart limit, and also his edits after showing that he knows of it even seem to prove that he simply is on a personal reverting series against me. I have already given him maximum warnings, but he vandalized the maximum warning template that I placed on his talk page without an edit summary. If I were to warn him again (which I am considering), I would be giving him four additional warnings for today alone, clearly meaning his warning limit has been exceeded. another revert on a different user's many edits 216.221.123.212 (talk) 22:49, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

I've reported the user to AIV - we'll see what they say. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 22:54, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Ha, I was just going to suggest to 216 to check out Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism and then I saw someone (you) did it already. - eo (talk) 22:55, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, I saw their post on my watchlist and decided to be bold and AIV it myself. ~~ [Jam]^[talk] 23:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

The Hot 100 articles

They may have charted as solo singles,but their albums credit them. ILikeMusicaLot (talk) 23:41, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

A year!

Hi Ericorbit, just wanted to say that it's now been a year since your RfA closed as successful. Hope you've had fun in your current time as an administrator. :) Acalamari 02:11, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

Viva la vida sold 500,000!!!!!!!!!!!!in uk!!!!!!!!1

go to coldplaying.com!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.193.92.180 (talk) 13:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Cpoldplay table of charts....

please delete digital downloads of uk because it's too a component chart —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fran.182 (talk • contribs) 21:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hot adult top 40 tracks is a component chart???

???please remove downloads....it makes no sense...and many songs in the table weren't singles —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fran.182 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hot 100 Brasil

Wow, looks like you've got some experience in this area! Should we start removing the external links to this supposed chart as well? Or is it legitimate enough for those to remain, just not notable enough for its own article? —Wknight94 (talk) 14:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Foo Fighters edit

It wasn't disruptive, I was asking a valid question and I expect a valid answer! Titan50 (talk) 14:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm... they're similiar. I think they both swear in their edit summaries. 75% certain, perhaps? Definitely a CU worthy case though. Thanks for your note! Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 14:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Ashley Tisdale

I seem to have been sucked into an edit war, and don't know where to go next. Any advice?
Kww (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

It's all over the Tisdale stuff. I filed this checkuser to try and sort out some of the possible sockpuppeting, but it hasn't been accepted by a clerk yet. Same basic pattern ... enormous fan articles being edit-warred in.
Kww (talk) 17:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

turkish chart

added turkish chart on the give it 2 me. DO NOT ERASE it!!! cos it'^s official and right and not a minor chart!!! --Triancula (talk) 21:33, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Lords of acid ablum cover LUST

hey i was working on my music library and i use wikipedia to add a cover and folder jpg to the album folder. when working on my lords of acid discography lust didn't have a cover, so i went to wikipedia and there was no cover. so i googled it, a found one, but thought to myself why cant i help wikipedia out and add the album cover to the article. i saw that you did most of if not all of the lords of acid cover. i tried to upload the album after do som research on how to but with little luck i did not prevail. if you could help me out on how you do it that would be awesome cause i come across many album article that i could add the cover art if i knew how. i hope you can help. thanks Vincentclee (talk) 02:25, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Casey —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vincentclee (talk • contribs) 02:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Triping defied your final warning

I think it's clear that this edit is Triping editing anonymously. My primary evidence is [the Ashley Tisdale discography edit history], which was being disrupted by 190.82.219.250, 190.82.206.75, 190.82.216.102, etc. Once it was semiprotected, Triping began to log in to perform the identical edits. 190.82.224.42 is pretty clearly the same editor.
Kww (talk) 17:09, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

This is explicitly her. I leave it to you to decide whether it is disruptive. I class it as such, but grant that it is borderline.
Kww (talk) 17:12, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

So I take it that you don't think it's an obvious enough sock to block the main account for a bit? Maybe it's just my annoyance level, but I feel like Triping is well overdue.
Kww (talk) 17:54, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Madonna Tour Articles

Hi. When you get the chance, could you please take a look over Madonna's tour articles. From VT to RIT, I fixed broken links, cleaned up the text, re-verified refs and layout so that each article has a consistent flow with one another, however, Jwad has reverted all of my edits for what I feel is b/c he doesn't like them. I feel he is gonna edit war with this so I felt it was appropriate to ask an admin to step in. Thanks Alkclark (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 01:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Madonna tour sections

I am not getting into an edit war with Alkclark (talk). I do not agree with the way this user has reconstructed the Madonna tour pages, as quite frankly it is ridiculous to read about the history of the subject at the bottom of the page. The setlist is not the most important part of the pages. The pages should be progressive and lead the viewer through the history of the subject in order - not in an unstructured way.

I suggest that you ask Alkclark (talk) to read: Wikipedia:Manual of Style as they have changed these pages which was unnecessary:

• It is inappropriate for an editor to change an article from one style to another unless there is a substantial reason to do so; for example, it is unacceptable to change from American to British spelling unless the article concerns a British topic. Edit warring over optional styles is unacceptable. If an article has been stable in a given style, it should not be converted without a reason that goes beyond mere choice of style. When it is unclear whether an article has been stable, defer to the style used by the first major contributor.

I hope you can clear up this matter. JWAD (talk)

Guys I took at look at both versions and while I don't see a problem with the content, I think it makes more sense in this case to place the track list at the end of the article. It's much the same way an album's page would be set up - with an intro, the history, etc., then the track list below it. If the track lists are at the top of the other Madonna tour articles, then I think that those should be changed, not the other way around. Alkclark - besides other Madonna Tour articles, have you seen any others that have a set list before the history and details of the tour? Just wondering. - eo (talk) 18:28, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

The Madonna tour sections only have the setlist at the beginning of the articles because Alkclark changed them to this format, before this user did this it was the correct order:- Intro, History and then details of The Show, Setlist, Cities etc. It has been like this for a long time. I suggest that these edits are reverted back to the old style as this is correct and in line with the Wikipedia:Manual of Style as mentioned above. Thanks JWAD (talk)

Sugababes discography

Hello. I just did a major edit to this article and its now up for FL status. Another editor (91.105.150.134) does not agree with the edits because they do not include what they believe should be in the article. I don't want to start an editing war so I was wondering how to go about having the article semi-protected. -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 17:55, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! -- Underneath-it-All (talk) 03:27, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok

Ok, I will.

--Piazzajordan2 (Talk.) (Hows my editing?) 10:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Shakespears_Sister.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Shakespears_Sister.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 09:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Erasure B-sides and non-album songs

I have nominated List of Erasure B-sides and non-album songs, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Erasure B-sides and non-album songs. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Tenacious D Fan (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Britney Spears on the article List of artist who reach #1

On Britney Spears' article it shows that she has 7 songs to go to number one. I've checked the references and they prove this. Therefore, I decided to chance the (1) to a (7). It was in no way, shape, or form "vandalism". Vandalism would have been if I would have put (24) or deleted her or something. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Avram44 (talk • contribs) 22:47, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

"Number one"

• Hi... i thought it was unhyphenated even when used as an adjective... but given this new element of doubt, and the large number of articles you allude to, i probably shouldn't do any more until we can establish a consensus. i think i'll see what the WP:ALBUM lot think. thanks for the heads-up. tomasz. 11:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
  • seems like i was wrong... cheers Eric, you saved me a bunch of unnecessary work. tomasz. 13:57, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Miles Away

Hi, I would also have a source...but it is an Italian site and the wikipedianos would be able not to understand --Dindo94 (talk) 13:14, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Why do you blocked the Madonna singles discography????????????

Hi!, i think you are wrong. Why do you blocked the Madonna Singles discography page????????????. Is a public page? or not..... "Give it 2 me" is number 1 in the Billboard Hot dance club play.