Eragon.raju

Welcome!

Hello, Eragon.raju, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! AustralianRupert (talk) 09:12, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Commas in dates

Hi Eragon.raju. Thanks for your recent edits to Charles Inglis (engineer). I have reverted your addition of commas into the dates. Please note that in accordance with Wikipedia's manual of style commas should not be used in such circumstances (unless the date is in the American "June 15, 2013" format). If you have any questions regarding this please feel free to get in touch at my talk page. Thanks - Dumelow (talk) 12:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Eragon.raju

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Eragon.raju requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Kolbasz (talk) 11:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of KAIZEN Realty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KAIZEN Realty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KAIZEN Realty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stalwart111 00:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of GarbleCard for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article GarbleCard is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GarbleCard until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stalwart111 01:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

AFDs

Hi Raju. Before you respond to more AFDs with more comments, there are a couple of things you should probably know. Before an article is nominated for deletion, the nominating editor has to conduct the checks set out at WP:BEFORE. I did so for both of the articles listed above. In searching for potential sources, I realised that both of the above (and a couple of other articles you created that have since been deleted) were fairly obviously linked to a particular Elance account - that is, someone has been paid to create them. Being paid to create Wikipedia articles is a breach of policy. You should also know that being paid to create a Wikipedia article for a company doesn't exempt that company from WP:N, WP:V or WP:RS. Not that it's any of my business but I would also be careful, if I were you, about describing yourself as an "expert Wikipedia editor" if you haven't yet familiarised yourself with basic policies or style guides. Stalwart111 05:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

SPI notice

You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Morning277. Thank you. —rybec 02:46, 22 July 2013 (UTC)