Image copyright problem with Image:GPE_2.7.png edit

Thanks for uploading Image:GPE_2.7.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

File:GPE 2.7.png listed for deletion edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:GPE 2.7.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RabidDeity (talk) 23:01, 2 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tools used for Euro sign edit

Thanks for the compliments. I built the Euro sign image with Adobe Illustrator, but I don't have any tool to convert it to SVG, which is why I didn't upload it in that format. Agateller (talk) 00:50, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply



Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot edit

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
131   MP/M (talk) Add sources
77   Phoronix Test Suite (talk) Add sources
993   GNU (talk) Add sources
9   OpenZaurus (talk) Add sources
25   Gmane (talk) Add sources
4,975   Eastern Time Zone (talk) Add sources
511   Apache Hive (talk) Cleanup
1,725   Free and open-source software (talk) Cleanup
60   Sugar (software) (talk) Cleanup
10,388   Linux (talk) Expand
248   Database trigger (talk) Expand
201   Multiuser DOS (talk) Expand
388   Comparison of relational database management systems (talk) Unencyclopaedic
62   Sharp Zaurus (talk) Unencyclopaedic
75   Psion (company) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
176   Window manager (talk) Merge
87   X window manager (talk) Merge
100   Burroughs MCP (talk) Merge
118   Enlightenment (software) (talk) Wikify
512   Wayland (display server protocol) (talk) Wikify
44   Query Rewriting (talk) Wikify
2   Whitix (talk) Orphan
22   Scriptcase (talk) Orphan
3   Amyris Fuels (talk) Orphan
11   Familiar Linux (talk) Stub
24   Olwm (talk) Stub
32   Qvwm (talk) Stub
36   Wm2 (talk) Stub
37   Swm (talk) Stub
54   Information schema (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:47, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

June 2022 edit

  Hi Emmanuel JARRI! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at National Association of Realtors that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 15:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

OK I understand, thank you for the clarification.
However, my modification was still appropriate. I don't have any link with this trade association. I was doing researches and as it says on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Association_of_Home_Builders : The National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) is one of the largest trade associations in the United States,[1]
with ~ 140,000 members,
then, when I saw NRA has 1,4 millions members, it is definitely one of the biggest.
If not the biggest, as states this article : https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/careers/jobs/national-association-of-realtors-nar/
Out of precaution I simply added "one of the biggest", which is definitely true.
Thank you. Emmanuel JARRI (talk) 18:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply