Emily rodriguez

You article is on what seems to be a really interesting topic, but I notice that you only have a couple sources, and only one of them is secondary. Can you find any other sources that may establish the importance of this topic? Either that, or base a larger section of your article on the secondary source. Listing all of the claims of the patent isn't really necessary or narratively interesting, but the history of the development of the patent might be, if you could find some secondary sources to confirm its value. LinkageDis (talk) 11:43, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Device for perfusing an animal head. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:01, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Diannaa! I will apply an attribution template as soon as I get a grasp on how to. Emily rodriguez (talk) 22:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Emily, This is your second peer review editor Sumer. I really like the idea of your article as I think it provides a fabulous case study to investigate the efficacy of patenting. I am quite surprised by the many different claims that the patent claim makes. I think you have a GREAT set-up here to really dig deeper into why patenting is such a boon and a bane in different situations. I am sure you have the content of this article sitting somewhere on your computer, and I am excited to read it. Reach out to me if you have any questions! Also be sure to review the plagiarism claims that Diannaa talks about. I am excited to read your full piece. Sumervaid (talk) 16:29, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi Sumer! Thank you, I look forward to updating the page with quite a bit of information regarding the use of patents at this time, as well as the original patent filer's intents in submitting this particular patent, imminently! Emily rodriguez (talk) 22:05, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Device for perfusing an animal head (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Device for perfusing an animal head may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 12:13, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Emily rodriguez, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DrStrauss talk 12:13, 30 June 2017 (UTC)