Ellyerin25
Welcome
edit
|
April 2013
editPlease refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Guliolopez (talk) 23:43, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
Ellyerin25, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Ellyerin25! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
May 2013
editThis is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Franklin D. Roosevelt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Please read what Wikipedia says about vandalism only accounts. - David Biddulph (talk) 15:52, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think this {{uw-vandalism4}} is a little harsh based on the content of the edits in my perspective which look more like test edits from a young user with limited common sense. I think that {{uw-test2}} would have been more appropriate. Technical 13 (talk) 16:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 16:38, 2 May 2013 (UTC)- Comment I'm opposed to this particular block as I do not feel this user was vandalizing pages. However, I think that this user needs to spend some time away from editing and read the links I've provided above in the welcome section to learn how to properly edit Wikipedia. Upon reading those guidelines, policies, and essays linked above, if this user requests unblocking (I expect that reading to take at least a week), then I would be willing to accept this user as my first adoptee in the Adopt a user program. Technical 13 (talk) 16:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)