Eliminimaxi

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Siniša Mali has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Siniša Mali was changed by Eliminimaxi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914892 on 2017-07-02T16:57:59+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:58, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Eliminimaxi, you are invited to try Wikipedia training modules

If you're looking for some guidance on how to get started, try these training modules. basic rules how to edit evaluating articles adding images citing sources copyright rules about these trainings We're trying to improve our tools for helping new editors get started. These trainings are hosted on the "Programs & Events Dashboard", a tool for helping Wikipedia editors organize editing events. You can optionally log in using your Wikipedia account to keep track of which trainings you've completed. If you have feedback, we'd love to hear it!

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 18:04, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Siniša Mali

It will be some time before the mayoralty of Siniša Mali enters printed books, encyclopedias and other “relevant” sources. Until then, those that we have for now are as good as any. I believe that his interviews and statements are the best sources there are. Nothing in the article is false and is quite well referenced, way better than his PhD thesis is. But we both know that’s not the real issue behind your repeated deleting. I can understand that you got an assignment but don’t expect from me to sympathize with you for that. PajaBG (talk) 13:29, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Edit War Siniša Mali

Hi Eliminimaxi,

As a new editor, you may not be aware that it's not allowed to repeatedly revert changes. This is called Edit Warring. It's regarded as unconstructive and will lead to your account being blocked. The preferred approach is to discus the reasons for the change you think is warranted on the article's talk page. I've started a section there for you to state your case so we can reach a consensus. In the meantime, please do not blank out the parts of the article you object to. AntiVan (talk) 14:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Siniša Mali. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:04, 3 July 2017 (UTC)