Welcome edit

Hello Elementrider77, and Welcome to Wikipedia! 

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Elementrider77, good luck, and have fun. --KuwarOnline Talk 08:20, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

editing questions(see Answer) edit

 
Hello, Elementrider77. You have new messages at KuwarOnline's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Andrew Housser edit

I reviewed your new article, and overall, it's OK. You have a number of statements which need to have a source cited. The source cited for the Housser quote does not contain the quote. I noted that on the article's discussion page. You need to modify your source for the "Bills.com #3 in the Hot 100 Fastest Growing Companies" statement. Please see the article discussion page for that explanation. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Mgreason (talk) 15:58, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your Request for Feedback edit



 
link=WP:Requests for feedback #Andrew Housser
 
link=WP:Requests for feedback #Andrew Housser





Hello, Elementrider77! I have replied to your request for feedback!


I have posted a reply to your request for feedback for Andrew Housser. You can read it here and reply, either with a question or to simply acknowledge it. Anyways, good luck and happy Wikipeding!
~ QwerpQwertus · Contact Me  · 18:22, 3 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
Note: If I forgot to remove the "New Unreviewed Article" notice or you asked me to publish it to main space and I forgot, feel free to tell me and I'd be happy to do it for you!

Leave me a message
  • For help with the article
  • If you have a question
  • For some feedback


November 2010 edit

  In a recent edit to the page Mary Jane Kelly, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. ⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 15:41, 9 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

FYI edit

  Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Freedom Debt Relief: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. -FASTILY (TALK) 18:20, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Block evasion edit

Block evasion is when an IP address or account is blocked, but through other means, the person behind the original IP address or account uses another IP address or account to still edit, evading the block placed on the original.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:39, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for getting back to me. What does WikiPedia do in those situations? I would assume they would block by IP when they block a username. Am I wrong in that assumption?
We just block the block evading account(s), and sometimes if possible, extend the original account/IP address' block. If we aren't sure, we have a tool called Checkuser that allows some users to look at the network data of users and draw conclusions. You may also want to take a look at autoblocking.Jasper Deng (talk) 20:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your help. I read into the Autoblock thing, how do I go about doing that? The guy that was blocked created a very obvious new account and did the exact same thing again. Elementrider77 (talk) 05:24, 4 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, Elementrider77. You have new messages at Mayur's talk page.
Message added 19:04, 22 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Mayur (talkEmail) 19:04, 22 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation edit

Your upload of File:Andrew Housser.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:53, 25 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

notability of Bills.com edit

Wikipedia:Notability (companies) is the relevant policy. It boils down to the fact that Wikipedia is not Yellow Pages, and we cannot have an entry for each business out there, or we would be overwhelmed by spam. We only include pages on organizations that are notable, which means they have attracted some significant coverage - not passing mentions, but serious journalists at major publications have wrote about them. I suggest adding as many sources as possible. Let me know when you are done. You can also remove the prod template, and if I am not satisfied then we can discuss this with others at WP:AFD. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 07:07, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest, disclosure required edit

  Hello, Elementrider77. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Freedom Debt Relief, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

  • Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
  • Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
  • Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

This notice also applies to editing on Bradford Stroh, Andrew Housser, bills.com and other related subjects. Brianhe (talk) 03:48, 20 July 2015 (UTC)Reply