Electronicmusicprofessor

Little context in Emotronic

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Emotronic, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Emotronic is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Emotronic, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 11:20, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Emotronic

I have nominated Emotronic, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotronic (3rd nomination). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Hoponpop69 (talk) 21:47, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Emotronic

A tag has been placed on Emotronic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Hoponpop69 (talk) 21:48, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Blocked IP

Hi! I noticed your request for the block of the IP which had vandalized the article on the music producer. I've blocked the IP for one week. Give a yell if he comes back. Thanks for your help. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Atelltaleheart by Dawn Richard.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Atelltaleheart by Dawn Richard.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

October 2011

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at List of dubstep musicians, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ridernyc (talk) 02:29, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Trendsetter production discography for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Trendsetter production discography is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trendsetter production discography until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. My76Strat (talk) 00:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)