SAT structure edit

I killed one glaring problem: the claim that the essay is "worth roughly 240 points" because it accounts for thirty percent of the score on the writing section. This claim is at best inaccurate, and at worst misleading, for at least two reasons: (1) norm referencing isn't linear, so that 30% of a raw-points score doesn't necessarily translate to 30% on the normed scale, and, MUCH more importantly, (2) the sections are scored 200-800 (not 0-800), so that "thirty percent" would only correspond to 180 points even in the unlikely event of perfectly linear scoring.

Inari Sámi edit

The accent mark in the word "Sámi" belongs in the title of the article, too. Somebody ought to fix that.


Proposed deletion of Vital Pharmaceuticals edit

 

The article Vital Pharmaceuticals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BEFORE reveals no sources with the necessary WP:CORPDEPTH required by the WP:NCORP guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Vital Pharmaceuticals for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vital Pharmaceuticals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vital Pharmaceuticals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2019 (UTC)Reply