ElPapiChulo69

October 2022

Hello, I'm Ingenuity. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nong Bua Lamphu province have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:55, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Nong Bua Lamphu province. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:57, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karl Jacobs, you may be blocked from editing. Alduin2000 (talk) 15:01, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Vandalize (album). Uhai (talk) 16:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane, threatens, attacks or impersonates another person, or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia. Please see our blocking and username policies for more information.

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, but users are not allowed to edit with accounts that have inappropriate usernames, and we do not tolerate 'bad faith' editing such as trolling or other disruptive behavior. If you believe that this block was incorrect or made in error, or would otherwise like to explain why you should be unblocked, you are welcome to appeal this block – read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the following text to the bottom of your user talk page here: {{unblock-un|new username|your reason here ~~~~}} -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:10, 10 October 2022 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ElPapiChulo69 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

ProfessorPlinky (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am very sorry for what I did. My account has been blocked, along with my IP address. If I am unblocked, I will stop using the account I have, because it violates username policies. I will only use Wikipedia as a resource to learn and help others. I am hoping you can unblock my IP address. I don't really care if you unblock my account or not, because I can just make a new one. ElPapiChulo69 (talk) 15:46, 11 October 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've proposed a new username for us to rename your account to, and then say you will stop using the account. You further say you will evade your block by creating a new account, and may have tried already since you are aware your IP is autoblocked. You've provided no reason to remove the block, and if you intend to evade it, there is nothing more to do here. 331dot (talk) 17:25, 11 October 2022 (UTC)