Teoman.32

Extended-confirmed required

It has come to my attention that you have recently started to edit in articles related to Armenia and Azerbaijan. This editing area is under a community imposed extended-confirmed restriction, specifically "Politics, ethnic relations, and conflicts involving Armenia, Azerbaijan, or both—broadly construed and explicitly including the Armenian genocide—are placed under an extended confirmed restriction." Your number of edits is below the threshold for editing in the area (you need at least 500 edits with your account existing for at least 30 days), thus you cannot currently edit in articles and content under the scope of WP:GS/AA, please refrain from doing so, any edits you have done since this restriction was implemented should be reverted, I will take the liberty of reverting wherever it's appropriate. - Kevo³²⁷ (talk) 15:50, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Warning

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Bitlis. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:37, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for repeated violations of WP:GS/AA across various articles, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 31 hours. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:32, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Battle of Bingöl moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Bingöl. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:55, 28 October 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

To enforce an arbitration decision, and for repeated violations of WP:GS/AA on the page Draft:Battle of Bingöl, you have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.

If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE|arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN|administrators' noticeboard]]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard, I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. 

_signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

---

Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" [in the procedure]). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 (talk) 08:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

By continuing to edit the Enver Pasha article, you have shown yourself to be completely unresponsive to messages here. Also, your editing pattern is highly suspicious. Graham87 (talk) 08:49, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

And for the old edits of my which has no source, im so sorry for those because i didnt knew how to Cite but i now know, if you can unblock me, i will give sources everytime i edit Efe urluca (talk) 23:37, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

The banning

So as you can see the edits i added/fixed the battles he joined and you can just check it by researching about those battles, and also can you elaborate about the suspicioussness of my pattern? Efe urluca (talk) 23:35, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Opening my ban

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teoman.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

To respond to other people in talk about my edits Efe urluca (talk) 23:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It looks like you've been evading your block by editing while logged out. Spicy (talk) 00:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Efe urluca (talk) 23:45, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Opening my ban (2nd topic)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teoman.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

To answer all the Wiki changes of my edit and edit more pages and giving sourcesEfe urluca (talk) 12:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your edits while signed out demonstrate it would be a mistake to unblock you at this time. I suggest waiting at least six months, then applying under WP:SO. If you sincerely wish to be unblocked at that time, you may need to suggest a WP:TOPICBAN and stick to non-contentious subject areas for at least a while. Yamla (talk) 12:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Opening my Ban 3rd article

Recently another administrator named Yamla declined my request bu Saying "Your edits while signed out demonstrate it would be a mistake to unblock you at this time." So in those edits i edited the Enver Pasha page bu adding more unadded battles that he participated in (you can see in the Wikipedia pages of those battles) and changed the result of the Battle of Bitlis, i understand that you guys could still think i would do the same actions but i know how to Cite and even i edit at a Military History Fandom and i understood the mechanics of editing, Citation/Giving sources etc. So i pretty much learned most things and i want to edit Wikipedia to make it more accurate, so at least please give me a chance and if you see something bad, you can ban me and i would not complain (sorry for my bad English)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teoman.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

please read The text Efe urluca (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You were given several chances. You were first blocked for 31 hours. Then you were blocked for one week. After that your problematic behavior continued anyway. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:44, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Efe urluca (talk) 16:38, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Opening my ban (4th topic)

a Administrator called jpgordon said "You were given several chances. You were first blocked for 31 hours. Then you were blocked for one week. After that your problematic behavior continued anyway." İn this text i clearly understood that he didnt read The text i wrote, in that text i said i didnt understood the other mechanics of the Wikipedia except for editing, but now after editing in other sites i understood the mechanics of the Wikipedia editing and now i want to open my ban on this platform so that i could make the Wikipedia more accurate so please read the text j give and think, i will not violate the editing mechanics since i understand it, have a nice day.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teoman.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Please Read the text i wrote Efe urluca (talk) 16:53, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Other websites are different than Wikipedia. As you concede that you don't understand the mechanics of editing, your edits were disruptive, and prior blocks failed to change your behavior, it would be a big mistake to unblock you at this time. I would suggest that you edit the Wikipedia of a language with which you are more familiar(as you concede here that English is not your main language) which may allow you to gain the necessary understanding of how Wikipedia works and later permit you to understand thing here better. I strongly suggest that you not edit this page again for six months, I would rather not remove your talk page access, but if you request unblock again before six months from now(start of August) that may happen. 331dot (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

About My ban

İts my fifth and last request so please dont remove talk page of me, i just do this again and again because administrators dont understand me, the other administrators didnt read/understood what i said so i will just make it Clear, when i started editing, i didnt know most of the mechanics like Citation, adding templates etc. And even i didnt know that i was getting banned and i didnt see the messages the administrators and Wikipedia had sent me. But after the ban happened, i started editing in a different website which uses the same templates as Wikipedia and has the same mechanics, after editing there for several months/weeks, i now fully know the mechanics of editing and in one of my old edits (about the Turkish War of Independence i stated i dont know English very well, but after that time i've been taking English courses and even i have 2 Erasmus Certificate, so i know English better and as you can see the recent edits of me in the Turkish Wiki you can see that i improved my editing skills fairly and if you just give me one chance i will prove that i improved myself, please read this text and think, i was just trying to make it more accurate but i didnt know how to Cite, but now as i stated in the old topics, i know the mechanics and now i just want to make the Wikipedia more accurate, so i beg you guys to just give me a chance, i will not make any more requests by now, and after you respond to it, please öpen another topic because i cant reply to administrator request thing, Take care.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teoman.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

because i didnt understood the mechanics before but now i fully do, please read The text Efe urluca (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM; the issue here is not that administrators have not read or understood you, it is the issues with your editing. Your intentions are not the issue here, it is the problematic behavior and the lack of communication when asked for clarification that contributed to the block. Aoidh (talk) 23:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Efe urluca (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

About my ban (again)

so you can see in the previous requests, i requested many times but declined in everytime, so i will do another one so please read this text, so when i started editing in the english wiki, i didnt knew the citing mechanics, and because i didnt knew it my edits rewerted, and its normal, after some unsourced edits, you guys sent me a message about it, but i didnt knew that i got a message since i didnt knew most of the mechanics and then @Graham87 banned me, and after that i didnt knew how to request and then i started editing another site which uses the same template's and mechanics of wikipedia, and editing there for a while, i understood the mechanics of editing, like giving citations etc. which i didnt knew, so after i understood i started to appeal for my ban, but it was declined several times, after when @331dot said that: "English is not your main language which may allow you to gain the necessary understanding of how Wikipedia works and later permit you to understand thing here better." i started to edit turkish wikipedia and if you see my edits, you can see that i have now understand the mechanics of editing, but now i want to edit the english wikipedia either because Most of the people uses english wikipedia. at least please give me a chance, Take Care.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Teoman.32 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

To edit the English Wikipedia (read the text) Efe urluca (talk) 12:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You clearly cannot be trusted; ten days ago you said you would make your last request ... and you also obviously never took in the message above about the time period to wait for the standard offer. I'm not going to let you waste the time of other admins. Graham87 (talk) 15:14, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Efe urluca (talk) 12:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Talk page access revoked

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Graham87 (talk) 15:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Bingöl

Hello, Efe urluca. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Bingöl, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)