Welcome!

edit

Hello, Dymchurchbeach, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! PhilKnight (talk) 22:31, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Owls Foundation (2) (September 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Dymchurchbeach, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Owls Foundation (2)

edit
 

Hello, Dymchurchbeach. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Owls Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Maria Glenn (March 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RadioFan (talk) 13:13, 13 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Red Bull Theatre

edit

I appreciate your recent corrections/amendments to Red Bull Theatre. However, can you please add some specific references for the various statements you are making (especially where these might be considered new information). The article was, and remains, badly in need of referencing. If you're unsure of the protocols, the simplest method is to click on the "Cite your sources" button at the foot of the edit page, and then add the reference in author-date format ("Griffith 2013, p. 123"). GrindtXX (talk) 11:15, 3 July 2018 (UTC)Reply