Notability of The Babylon Whackers

edit
 

A tag has been placed on The Babylon Whackers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:52, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Falsely licensed images

edit

Inserting other people's work (Image:TheStoryOfEgmo.gif) into Wikipedia without permission or attribution is unacceptable. Copyright infringement and plagiarism pose serious moral, legal, and reputation problems. Remember: Users who upload content (Image:TheStoryOfEgmo.gif) with false license declarations ... may be blocked. feydey (talk) 10:10, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Images

edit

Please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials as it seems to concern this picture. feydey (talk) 14:25, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Re:The Story of Egmo Image

edit

Hey, I claim to own the copyrights to Coca-Cola and Mickey Mouse — point being You need to verify this through OTRS as people can claim anything Dubber99. Please read the previously linked page carefully and act according to their recommendations. See also Wikipedia:Copyright_problems#Copyright_owners_who_submitted_their_own_work_to_Wikipedia. Best, feydey (talk) 14:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Dubber99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

And thanks for using the OTRS system for the Egmo image. You might be also interested in WP:BOOKS, WP:NOVELS and Portal:Literature. feydey (talk) 15:36, 22 October 2008 (UTC)Reply