Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Welcome!

edit

Hello, Drkmwinters, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright, notability, original research

edit

Assertion of authorship, or of permission to reproduce, is not enough, for two reasons:

  • We cannot be sufficiently certain that someone on the end of a wire is who they say or has the authority they claim.
  • Release to Wikipedia involves more than just permission to reproduce: our CC-BY-SA license allows any reader to copy, modify, and re-use for any purpose including commercial, and it is essential that the actual copyright holder understands and agrees to that. I see that as well as bearing a copyright note in your name, the source page is also labelled "© Copyright 2003-2012 Universities of Essex and Manchester. All rights reserved."

For details, see Wikipedia:Copyrights#Contributors' rights and obligations. There are ways to make a suitable copyright release, explained at WP:Donating copyrighted materials. Read that carefully, and note the section headed "Wikipedia does not publish original research", which leads to my next point.

Can you give references to independent comment about your study? As an encyclopedia, one of Wikipedia's fundamental policies is WP:No original research, which includes: "If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it." That links to the Wikipedia:Notability requirement for articles to show that their subjects have had "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." See also WP:NOR#Primary, secondary and tertiary sources.

The links in the Welcome message above will tell you more about Wikipedia: WP:Your first article is a good introduction to what an acceptable article needs.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:40, 3 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deleted submission has been restored

edit

As a result of the permission received and processed.--SPhilbrick(Talk) 21:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Qualitative Election Study of Britain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 16:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Qualitative Election Study of Britain, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 16 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Qualitative Election Study of Britain

edit
 

Hello Drkmwinters. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Qualitative Election Study of Britain".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Qualitative Election Study of Britain}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 22:03, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply