Dreugenecharlesnyc

Welcome!

A cup of hot tea to welcome you!

Hello, Dreugenecharlesnyc, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
• Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 06:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Applied kinesiology

1. Welcome
2. On Wikipedia, you are anonymous wp:Wikipedia is anonymous
3. Per wp:verifiability, all significant information needs to wp:cite a wp:reliable source. Use of your own knowledge, is wp:original research (not acceptable)
4. Don't remove citations without giving a very good reason for doing so.

Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 06:35, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Hello, I'm Crystallizedcarbon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Applied kinesiology, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:46, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Your edits

You have been reverted a couple of times now. Please stop it. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 21:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Hi there The Quixotic Potato,

why should I stop to correct a page full of errors? I thought Wiki was about giving truthful information. I am following guidelines given to me by a previous editor. If you have something constructive to say I am willing to follow your suggestions to make this page accurate. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreugenecharlesnyc (talk • contribs)

You seem to be unable to differentiate between reliable medical sources and bullshit written by quacks. People may have misled you into thinking that they have taught you useful skills which you can use to help people, but that is simply not true. You are not a doctor. Quacks rarely are. You are a victim of quacks who is creating more victims. You are trying to Right Great Wrongs by telling people the truth. Wikipedia does not care about people's individual versions of the truth, we try to present verifiable information from reliable sources. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 04:18, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

The Quixotic Potato ...Now the ugly truth comes out. It seems you have a personal prejudice against me and what I have been doing for over 30 years. For the record, I've been published in peer review journals and partook of two rigorous control and cohort studies meticulously coordinated by a Harvard Researcher. So where did you get these malicious opinions of yours? How are you able to work at Wiki?

Whatever your prejudices are, they are unfounded. No intelligent person can cast aspersions against a health discipline (or anything else for that matter) if you have not experienced it firsthand. So I encourage you to stop hiding behind your computer and come to my office and experience an Applied Kinesiology examination and treatment for yourself. If you still feel this way afterwards—while I do not agree—I would defend your right to say it all this. However, if you refuse this request, you suffer the fate of proving yourself to be a bigoted coward who speaks out of ignorance.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreugenecharlesnyc (talk • contribs) 20:29, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

If you keep posting personal attacks you will get blocked. I don't care but other people do. Did you click the links I posted? Have you read those pages?

Not sure how I can have a personal prejudice against someone I've never met or heard about, and haven't even bothered to Google.

I've never visited the USA and I do not intend to. Maybe you feel very brave calling someone a "bigoted coward who speaks out of ignorance" on the internet, but if I would meet you (which is not going to happen) then you would be very polite to me. Even the people you are scared of would treat me very politely.

Unlike you I have defended people who posted unpopular opinions I disagreed with on Wikipedia, and I didn't demand that they travel thousands of kilometers.

Applied Kinesiology is quackery; I'll stick with my local hospital.

The idea that someone has to try something before they can criticize it is stupid. For example, I have never tried using a dowsing rod, but I know dowsing is bullshit.

(((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 21:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Rosner3.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rosner3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Rosner2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rosner2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:45, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Rosner1.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Rosner1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 19:46, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Rosner4.png

Thanks for uploading File:Rosner4.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Rosner1.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rosner1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 04:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Rosner2.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rosner2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 04:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Rosner3.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rosner3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 04:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

File:Rosner4.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rosner4.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 04:21, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rosner1.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rosner1.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:58, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rosner2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rosner2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:59, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rosner3.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Rosner3.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:59, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Rosner4.png

A tag has been placed on File:Rosner4.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 00:59, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:19, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked for ongoing copyright concerns, incivility and disruptive editing. Apologies. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 06:19, 31 August 2017 (UTC)