edit
 

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Chelsea 2-0 Arsenal 7 february 2010, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://theworldgame.sbs.com.au/report-chelsea-2-arsenal-0-287547. As a copyright violation, Chelsea 2-0 Arsenal 7 february 2010 appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Chelsea 2-0 Arsenal 7 february 2010 has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 19:05, 7 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Non Free Images in your User Space

edit

  Hey there Dragonulteo, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Dragonulteo/fantasy league/Premier League. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use images to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

  • See a log of images removed today here

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 02:20, 21 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

July 2010

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Aston Villa F.C.. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:32, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Costel Enache

edit
 

The article Costel Enache has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GiantSnowman 15:20, 24 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Done Dragonulteo (talk) 06:56, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Romanian Wikipedia is not an acceptable source. GiantSnowman 09:34, 25 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Done Again. I hope this is fine. Dragonulteo (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:A Dark Enchanted Crystal Night.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:A Dark Enchanted Crystal Night.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 4 October 2015 (UTC)Reply