July 2014

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Civilization V has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Welcome!

edit
 
Some cookies to welcome you!  

Welcome to Wikipedia, Dragonmagicediter! Thank you for your contributions. I am Torchiest and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! —Torchiest talkedits 19:38, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to Civilization V were automatically reverted because they added a broken reference. The bot above thought that it was vandalism. Check out WP:REF for more information on putting together a correct reference. A few other minor points. The section you added for "military" was a top level section, whereas the paragraph could probably just be added to the "gameplay" section. You might want to look through that section and see if there's a better place to add it. Also, you don't want to use the word "you" or similar in articles. Say "the player" instead. Cheers. —Torchiest talkedits 19:41, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

November 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm Denisarona. Your recent edit to the page Ebola virus disease appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 14:32, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ebola virus disease. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. Medical claims need much, much stronger sources than some children's web cartoon about a robot. McGeddon (talk) 15:00, 22 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Dragonmagicediter! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 00:01, Monday, April 6, 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Dragonmagicediter! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 21:33, Monday, April 6, 2015 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

edit
 
Hi Dragonmagicediter! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 20:32, Tuesday, April 7, 2015 (UTC)

February 2016

edit

  Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Ender's Game, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Antepenultimate (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please also review Wikipedia's policies regarding Original Research. I reverted your most recent addition to Ender's Game as it was an apparent analysis of the source material, but was not referenced to secondary sources. References to the book itself are only appropriate for straightforward synopsis of the plot, not for interpretations of the material. Thank you, and take care - Antepenultimate (talk) 15:42, 21 February 2016 (UTC)Reply