Dr Holy Joker

Welcome!

Hi Dr Holy Joker! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 23:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

• I hope you can do without comments about accusing others to stop spreading lies and propaganda. Drmies (talk) 23:05, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Algerian War, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 03:55, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Algerian War; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 04:00, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Consensus

You have been told by many editors to seek consensus for the change, so don't pretend otherwise. M.Bitton (talk) 04:01, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Dr_Holy_Joker reported by User:M.Bitton (Result: ). Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 04:17, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Indefinite block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for disruptive editing (historical fabrications).

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 04:54, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Holy Joker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Wow I was blocked another time because some user is crying and refuse to accept the historical fact and that's my sources are better than his.... is Wikipedia a coummnist based page? Dr Holy Joker (talk) 05:09, 14 March 2021 (UTC) can someone be real and help me with this matter please? Is that the free Encyclopedia or the coummnistpedia? Dr Holy Joker (talk) 05:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Requests that attack other users are not considered. You were blocked for what you did, not for what others did. 331dot (talk) 07:06, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Holy Joker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I didn't attack anyone!!! There is some specific user who keep removing whatever someone else changing and it's not according to his opinion. I just added there 15 sources with a lot of information and he keep removing! He is doing the same with other users and not just with me. Please look at history of the page there. Dr Holy Joker (talk) 07:21, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

WP:IDHT. Talk only about your actions, not those of other editors. You were blocked for your actions. WP:GAB explains how to craft an appropriate unblock. You'll likely only get one more chance. Yamla (talk) 10:53, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dr Holy Joker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I ask to remove the block and let me go to another consensus and that one of the admins who see those messages will lock a little bit at the talk page there and let the decision be to administration of Wikipedia please. Because there was no a neutral point of view in my opinion there. Dr Holy Joker (talk) 11:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have failed to address your own conduct, or to show that you are interested in introducing anything but your own opinions. I have removed talkpage access to end the unproductive appeals.. Acroterion (talk) 13:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely for persistently making disruptive edits. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  Acroterion (talk) 13:27, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 41360 declined

UTRS appeal #41360 has been declined. I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:52, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

UTRS 41453

UTRS appeal #41453 has been opened. Initial reply-- 1) Please. Stop blaming others. 2) Please. You wrote, "goes to the admins and keep crying ". That's not why you were blocked. 3) Please read your talk page. Please address the issues raised there. Please describe what you did and what you should do instead. 5) Please read the decline notices on your talk page. Acroterion puts it this way, "You have failed to address your own conduct, or to show that you are interested in introducing anything but your own opinions." I wholeheartedly agree. We await your response. Please be aware that each time you fail to address your behavior, you raise the likelihood of being banned from UTRS. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 08:30, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

permalink to related ANI discussion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)