Hello, DrPhen, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Guillaume2303 (talk) 04:41, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

The "people" that Groves is discussing

edit

When you write:

  • "a lengthy quote bashing people unrelated to Ashton" and
  • "long litanies of criticisms of other people than Ashton on Ashton's article"

...you are ignoring the fact that the "people" concerned are those whose testimonies are the sole subject, and main content of Ashton's book. So it is not at all surprising that Grove pays particular attention to them in his conclusion. Likewise this book is Ashton's sole prominent contribution on creationism (he has advanced no creationist concept of his own of any note), so it is hardly surprising that the article devotes some space to the conclusion of the lengthiest, most in-depth and most prominently-authored review of it. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sharur (mythological weapon) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharur (mythological weapon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

Deletion review of Sharur (mythological weapon)

edit

I have commented on this at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 June 24. Your article has not in fact been deleted but I can quite understand your worry that it had been or would be. As things stand at present it will be kept but someone might nominate it properly for deletion in future. Get in touch if you think I can be of help. I see you have been editing Ninurta and I do wonder whether the information on the weapon could be incorporated there rather than in a separate article. However, this is a matter of editorial choice and different people might legitimately have different views under Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Best wishes. Thincat (talk) 09:45, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reply. When looking into things I found these references.[1][2][3][4] I have no background knowledge myself so I did not feel like adding any of this. I happen to have an encylopedia of mythology. It mentions Ninurta's weapon in passing but does not name it. Thincat (talk) 09:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eric Sanicola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Removal of AN/I report?

edit

It's a bad idea to remove discussion from noticeboards. Could you explain why you removed Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Thibbs today? —C.Fred (talk) 03:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Susan Strange Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, DrPhen, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Guillaume2303 (talk) 04:41, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

The "people" that Groves is discussing

edit

When you write:

  • "a lengthy quote bashing people unrelated to Ashton" and
  • "long litanies of criticisms of other people than Ashton on Ashton's article"

...you are ignoring the fact that the "people" concerned are those whose testimonies are the sole subject, and main content of Ashton's book. So it is not at all surprising that Grove pays particular attention to them in his conclusion. Likewise this book is Ashton's sole prominent contribution on creationism (he has advanced no creationist concept of his own of any note), so it is hardly surprising that the article devotes some space to the conclusion of the lengthiest, most in-depth and most prominently-authored review of it. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 05:48, 15 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sharur (mythological weapon) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sharur (mythological weapon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article..

Deletion review of Sharur (mythological weapon)

edit

I have commented on this at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 June 24. Your article has not in fact been deleted but I can quite understand your worry that it had been or would be. As things stand at present it will be kept but someone might nominate it properly for deletion in future. Get in touch if you think I can be of help. I see you have been editing Ninurta and I do wonder whether the information on the weapon could be incorporated there rather than in a separate article. However, this is a matter of editorial choice and different people might legitimately have different views under Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Best wishes. Thincat (talk) 09:45, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the reply. When looking into things I found these references.[5][6][7][8] I have no background knowledge myself so I did not feel like adding any of this. I happen to have an encylopedia of mythology. It mentions Ninurta's weapon in passing but does not name it. Thincat (talk) 09:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eric Sanicola, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Singles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Removal of AN/I report?

edit

It's a bad idea to remove discussion from noticeboards. Could you explain why you removed Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User:Thibbs today? —C.Fred (talk) 03:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Susan Strange Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Steve Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)Reply