Dorman

Your edit to Geordi La Forge

Your recent edit to Geordi La Forge (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:26, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Game Falcon

Please refrain from creating inappropriate pages. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Merope 15:26, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Page blanking

Please do not delete content from articles on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:YouTube. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. fraggle 23:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC) (

August 2007

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to YouTube, you will be blocked from editing. —METS501 (talk) 05:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

• Creation of WikiTech and WikTech has earned you a brief block. -- RHaworth 18:18, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Dorman Model

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Dorman Model requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Wadeperson (talk) 05:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

• I have declined the speedy deletion nomination, because I do not think the cited criterion applied. However, I have proposed the article for deletion - formal notice below. For the reasons why it is not suitable for Wikipedia, please read WP:No original research. JohnCD (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Dorman Model

The article The Dorman Model has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This cites no references to establish notability, and appears to be original research.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnCD (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2011 (UTC)