User talk:Doniago/Archive 61

Archive 55

←

Archive 59

Archive 60

Archive 61

Archive 62

Archive 63

→

Archive 65

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
392		Sublingual administration (talk)						Add sources
8		The Return of the World's Greatest Detective (talk)						Add sources
217		And the Band Played Waltzing Matilda (talk)						Add sources
263		Foundation (cosmetics) (talk)						Add sources
129		High School of Performing Arts (talk)						Add sources
33		The Case of the Whitechapel Vampire (talk)						Add sources
317		The Great Game (Sherlock) (talk)						Cleanup
34		Buddy Williams (country musician) (talk)						Cleanup
47		Battle of Blanc Mont Ridge (talk)						Cleanup
7		The Dying Detective (film) (talk)						Expand
5		The Devil's Foot (talk)						Expand
14		National Catholic Forensic League (talk)						Expand
258		Duffel bag (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
214		Disney Sing-Along Songs (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
563		Electronica (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
279		Baritsu (talk)						Merge
147		Santur (talk)						Merge
9		Iraqi Santur (instrument) (talk)						Merge
510		Canon of Sherlock Holmes (talk)						Wikify
38		Willkommen (talk)						Wikify
157		Professional Children's School (talk)						Wikify
7		Kathryn Doby (talk)						Orphan
3		Judy Gordon (producer) (talk)						Orphan
4		Jasmin Bašić (talk)						Orphan
6		The Limejuice Mystery or Who Spat in Grandfather's Porridge? (talk)						Stub
8		Dagworth Station (talk)						Stub
18		Anindo Chatterjee (talk)						Stub
378		Sexual tension (talk)						Stub
14		Werner Thomas (talk)						Stub
3		James Barr (composer) (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Stephen Dorf Jewish Category

Hello.

Dorfs article writes that he is "half Jewish" and quotes dorf saying he was raised that way. So I don't see what I did wrong. I always check articles for sources and verify everything. If I made a genuine mistake feel free to change it.

but thanks for checking.

2602:306:3B27:2670:BD94:737:854B:F01A (talk) 22:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

The article doesn't say he is half-Jewish, it says, "he was "kinda brought up half-Jewish"". That doesn't make it a current state. Thanks for your understanding! DonIago (talk) 03:13, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

The Girl Who Slept Too Little

Good morning, Doniago! Sorry, my fault. I'd misread the sentence. With a comma plus an "and", it indicates two separate actions: Marge and Homer worrying about Lisa, and Bart doing nothing but watch cartoons. With the comma removed, it indicates parental concern for them both. Thanks for bearing with me. :-). Zoidbergmd 15:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

No worries! We all make mistakes. :) DonIago (talk) 14:28, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

I, Frankenstein

Hi. I was just wondering, what source should I use? I know a few, but I'm confused on what I should use to confirm the entry (if you know what I mean). --Volts and Lightning! (talk) 22:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for getting in touch. You should provide a third-party source (i.e. the film's own website wouldn't qualify) that characterizes the film as a monster movie. Hopefully not to hard to find, but entries in list articles are required to be verifiable members of that list. A review of the movie that calls it a monster movie would likely suffice. Hope this helps? DonIago (talk) 05:40, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Content	Headings	Images	Links	Sources	Tagged with…
208		Cecily Adams (talk)						Add sources
28		William Houston (actor) (talk)						Add sources
18		Edgar Pangborn (talk)						Add sources
162		Tech noir (talk)						Add sources
156		Professor Moriarty in other media (talk)						Add sources
19		Victorian Undead (talk)						Add sources
116		Killer toy (talk)						Cleanup
994		Field of Dreams (talk)						Cleanup
128		John W. Campbell (talk)						Cleanup
57		East River Greenway (talk)						Expand
140		Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire (video game) (talk)						Expand
55		Sherlock Holmes (puppetry) (talk)						Expand
58		Buffyverse (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
49		Angel (Buffy the Vampire Slayer episode) (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
1,198		Magical objects in Harry Potter (talk)						Unencyclopaedic
363		The Casual Vacancy (miniseries) (talk)						Merge
7		Tottenville Beach, Staten Island (talk)						Merge
903		Narration (talk)						Merge
51		Geek girl (talk)						Wikify
144		Evil twin (talk)						Wikify
275		The Silkworm (talk)						Wikify
6		WaHI (talk)						Orphan
2		Aklansk (talk)						Orphan
2		Aboha (talk)						Orphan
15		Cabrini Boulevard (talk)						Stub
11		Hamilton Fish Park Pool (talk)						Stub
23		Queen Elizabeth II September 11th Garden (talk)						Stub
10		New York Restoration Project (talk)						Stub
53		Matilda (1978 film) (talk)						Stub
9		Muscota Marsh (talk)						Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:05, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Doniago. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Slatersteven (talk) 14:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Time travel

So your justification for undoing my edit here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_time_travel_works_of_fiction&diff=756187915&oldid=756186042 was it was not sourced? Yet your revert not only kept in the unsourced item, but restored another equally unsourced item. Can you explain?Slatersteven (talk) 15:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Seeing as how you already made other edits to the article, I'm not sure why you came here? That said, I'm not seeing where my edit restored anything... DonIago (talk) 16:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Because I want to know why, and here is the version you restored to https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_time_travel_works_of_fiction&diff=756185283&oldid=755702512

Including the item you claimed I had added that needed sourcing

3 Time travel in videogames

Here is the same section (and the one you removed from my edit, but in a different place).

2 Time travel in anime

3 Time travel in videogames

I do not understand your decision to undo my edit and restore to a worse version,(nor why your marked it as a minor edit), in that it not only included the same (unsourced) materiel but added a new (unsourced) one. It does not mater if I removed the material subsequently, you did not remove it, and in fact just re-inserted it in a different order, why?Slatersteven (talk) 16:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

When I review the link you provided showing my edit, the only change I see is that I removed your addition of the videogames section and the one entry you provided. Are you possibly referring to changes made by other editors? Given that all I'm seeing that my edit did was remove material, I'm not seeing how you can claim that I added unsourced material at the same time.

In any event, before I'd seen that you had made additional edits to the article, I was considering that my own edit may have been unwarranted. As you've since overwritten my change in any case, there doesn't seem to be much left to discuss? DonIago (talk) 17:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Really you cannot see that my edit did not have "2 Time travel in anime" and yours restored it?Slatersteven (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

When I view the diff you provided, I'm not seeing that. In any event, it's not there now, so can we declare the beaten horse dead? DonIago (talk) 17:49, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

It is not a dead horse when someone refuses to acknowledge they made a mistake, yours was not a minor edit, and did not remove, it just moved material. I am not sure why you refuse to explain your actions. If they were an honest mistake, and (for example) you did not mean to claim it was a minor edit fine. But it would be nice if you either admitted it was a mistake or denied it.Slatersteven (talk) 18:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

As I've already said, I was going to review my changes and possibly revert them at the time, but you've since made substantial edits. I have no interest in revisiting what I did to ascertain whether or not I should have reverted it now that you've made it immaterial. If this is of significant concern to you, then in the future I would recommend that you consider reviewing WP:BRD and initiating conversations about troublesome edits before making further changes. Cheers. DonIago (talk) 19:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Unknown Pleasures

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Unknown Pleasures. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Kurt Cobain

Hey, guy, I corrected an item on the Kurt Cobain page (I changed "cause of death" to "manner of death" for obvious reasons) and you changed it back! Mind explaining why you did that? SnoozeKing (talk) 21:20, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your edit had been contested by multiple editors. As I noted in my edit summary, and per WP:BRD, when you make an edit which is reverted, the best course of action is to initiate a discussion at the article's Talk page, where involved editors can weigh in. What you generally should not do is simply reinsert your change, which may be construed as edit-warring. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 16:41, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

SpaceCamp

You people never learn do you? Look on the back of the DVD or Blu-Ray or watch it on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZJGe7sZvxo 147 minutes. Go bother somebody else. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.102.157.201 (talk • contribs)

IMDb clearly lists 107 minutes. If you don't want to be bothered, don't insert information which can easily be shown to be inaccurate. DonIago (talk) 18:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tinderbox (Siouxsie and the Banshees album)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tinderbox (Siouxsie and the Banshees album). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)