I am interested in discussing the management of globalization on local economies from an economic development perspective... How do local economies best transition their workforces, resources and economic development tools to compete and win in the current economy?

In addition one of my favorite topics is the development and uses of what I refer to as "Hybrid Capital." Hybrid Capital is the multiple pots of monies locally that can be utilized to grow the local economies from various and largely different outlooks. Perhaps some might be dedicated to traditional high-tech and robust physical infrastructure, some to innvoation and entrepreneurial research and development of new business ideas and markets, some might be used as seed & venture monies, traditional buildings & sites fast tracking, shovel ready sites for greenfield or reuse of brownfield development, speculative buildings aimed at niche users to diversify the local economy and attract new investment in an area not yet mature for the community, or destination based projects that create a unique brand and attraction of visitors "Placed Based Development." I think all economic development should have a deal closing fund (the if not but for fund of monies) that can be used to close a critical deal. some refer to them as opportunity funds. Last but not least is the development of catalyst projects those that change in a positive manner the business climate and create opportunities for ample new business investments to occur.Donholbrook 16:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Considering the recent melt down of the global economy... I think discussion of this topic is merited.

June 2007

edit

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at Don Holbrook. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. User:RandomHumanoid(talk) 17:24, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Holbrook has authored two books to date. They are "The Little Black Book of Economic Development" and "Who Moved My Smokestack?" He is currently working on his next book in the trilogy, "The Next America an Inconvenient Economy."

Speedy deletion nomination of Don Holbrook

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Don Holbrook, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. GregJackP (talk) 01:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

FYI conflict of interest guideline

edit

  If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia in Don Holbrook, Economic Development World Class Cities Rankings, User:Donholbrook, or other articles, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. – Athaenara 02:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)Reply