User talk:Doctor Papa Jones/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Doctor Papa Jones. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Merci bien
Note, some of the info in Thomas and Wegmann does not fully match the article in its current state. I will post the discrepancies on your talk page and leave it up to you to address them. Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 20:41, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, that would be most helpful. Jonas Vinther (talk) 20:42, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Page 46
- Transferred from the Selekta of the Hauptkadettenanstalt Groß Lichterfelde near Berlin (now in Berlin) to the 9th Company of Königin Elisabeth Garde Grendier Regiment Nr.3 in Berlin-Charlottenburg as Leutnant on 22 March 1900
- On 20 November 1900 (with an effective date of 1 December 1900) transferred to the 3. Garde Feld Artillerie Regiment in Berlin and Beeskow for 6 months
- Page 47
- Officially posted to the 3. Garde Feld Artillerie Regiment on 18 May 1901
- Attended 2nd course of the Feldartillerie-Schießschule (10 February 1903 to 31 May 1903)
- Assigned to the rifle factory in Spandau (1 May 1905 to 13 May 1905)
- Adjutant of the 2nd department and Court Officer/3. Garde Feld Artillerie Regiment (5 February 1906 to 28 February 1909)
- Regimental adjutant/3. Garde Feld Artillerie Regiment (13 April 1909 to 31 March 1912)
- I will fix and reply to you a bit later; I need to do something else right now. Jonas Vinther (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Well spotted, and good initiative. I mainly reformulated or corrected the already-added information in the "Early life" section. The particular sentence first mentioned on page 47 in the article was just meant to state when he exactly began his military career (and not necessarily when he received his official post). This mention are (in my opinion) not really needed; Brauchitsch, as well as many other Prussian officers, spent the early ears of their military education in countless military units and positions. It would not be worth to mention them all. Also, the balk of this article's information comes Hart. It's possible his book might have some discrepancies (being written in 1944). Should I have added some incorrect information, that's my mistake, and should of course be fixed (which most are now). Anyways, I see you've corrected and added lots yourself in the discussed section; awesome job. And thank you. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 22:28, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- Do as you please. I have made different experiences when trying to move an article forward on the quality scale. Don't you think his WWI section is a bit understated? you reduced it to "By the outbreak of World War I in August 1914, he had reached the rank of captain, and was appointed as staff officer to the XVI Army Corps stationed near Metz. Here Brauchitsch took part the heavy fighting against the French 3rd Army in the Battle of Verdun (1916)." According to my sources he fought in
- Well spotted, and good initiative. I mainly reformulated or corrected the already-added information in the "Early life" section. The particular sentence first mentioned on page 47 in the article was just meant to state when he exactly began his military career (and not necessarily when he received his official post). This mention are (in my opinion) not really needed; Brauchitsch, as well as many other Prussian officers, spent the early ears of their military education in countless military units and positions. It would not be worth to mention them all. Also, the balk of this article's information comes Hart. It's possible his book might have some discrepancies (being written in 1944). Should I have added some incorrect information, that's my mistake, and should of course be fixed (which most are now). Anyways, I see you've corrected and added lots yourself in the discussed section; awesome job. And thank you. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 22:28, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
- I will fix and reply to you a bit later; I need to do something else right now. Jonas Vinther (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
- Othain sector (22–27 August 1914)
- Maas crossings (22 August–1 September 1914)
- Battle near Varennes-Montfaucon (2–3 September 1914)
- Verdun and Argonne (4–5 September 1914)
- Battle near Vaubecourt-Fleury (6–12 September 1914)
- Battle at Varennes (17–24 September 1914)
- In the Argonne forrests (25 September – 20 August 1916)
- At Verdun (10 September – 28 October 28 October 1916)
- Singled out are his actions over fortress Douaumont (24 October 1916)
- Actions in the Vogesen (3 November – 7 December 1916)
- Argonne forests (7 February – 9 March 1917)
- Battle at the Aisne (10 March – 5 April 1917)
- Aisne-Champagne (6 April – 27 May 1917)
- Chemin des Dames (28 May – 22 August 1917)
- Actions between Maas and Mosel (24 August – 12 September 1917)
- Champagne (28 September – 30 October 1917)
- At Artois (22 February – 20 March 1918)
- Spring Offensive (21 March – 6 April 1918)
- Battle at Armentieres (17–18 April 1918)
- French Flandern (19 April – 21 May 1918, 5 July – 16 July 1918, 5 August – 14 August 1918)
- Flandern (5 September – 27 September 1918)
- Actions at Jepren-La-Bassee (28 August – 4 September 1918)
- Defensive actions at Flandern (28 September – 17 October 1918)
- At Yser and Lys (18 – 24 October 1918)
- Battle at Lys (25 October – 1 November 1918)
- Retreating actions at Antwerp-Maas (5 – 11 November 1918)
- Retreat and back into Germany (13 November 1918)
I think you need to expand this section and single it out. WWI is a major historic event and Von Brauchitsch was in the thick of it from start to finish. He also received some significant awards which need to be put in context. MisterBee1966 (talk) 06:32, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- I posted a reply on your talk page. Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:41, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- I am not denying that he fought at Verdun. My point is that this was not the only battle he fought in. Yes, it is the same source. MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- MisterBee1966, I have a family dinner right now, but right afterwards, I will massively (or create a section for it) expand his life in World War I. If you could list the Thomas & Wegmann book pages (and other useful information, if any) that would be great. Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Enjoy your dinner! :-) Sure I gladly help out. MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Send me an email if you wish. I'll send you the scanned pages MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- How do I get your email? Jonas Vinther (talk) 18:44, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Go to my talk page, on the left you see the "Tools" section, in this section click on "Email this user". Cheers MisterBee1966 (talk) 07:53, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- How do I get your email? Jonas Vinther (talk) 18:44, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Send me an email if you wish. I'll send you the scanned pages MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Enjoy your dinner! :-) Sure I gladly help out. MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:57, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- MisterBee1966, I have a family dinner right now, but right afterwards, I will massively (or create a section for it) expand his life in World War I. If you could list the Thomas & Wegmann book pages (and other useful information, if any) that would be great. Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:53, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- I am not denying that he fought at Verdun. My point is that this was not the only battle he fought in. Yes, it is the same source. MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
I think you should have a look here. I think his view on the Commissar Order is vital to a GA rating. MisterBee1966 (talk) 15:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you, mate. Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:10, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- So, the way I understand it, MisterBee1966, he did not protest when Hitler shifted permission to kill commissars from the SS to the army, but eventually issued a degree that gave officers some leeway, and that they were only to execute commissars if they were extremely forthright about their anti-German sentiments? Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I posted a question on Brauchtisch in media on the article talk page, and would appreciate your views. Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Mate, I will email you tomorrow; it's pretty late at my end of the world. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 23:49, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- Also, I posted a question on Brauchtisch in media on the article talk page, and would appreciate your views. Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:28, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
- So, the way I understand it, MisterBee1966, he did not protest when Hitler shifted permission to kill commissars from the SS to the army, but eventually issued a degree that gave officers some leeway, and that they were only to execute commissars if they were extremely forthright about their anti-German sentiments? Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Battle of Verdun
I see you have this at GAN under World history. I think you would get a quicker and more expert review if you put it in the Warfare section. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:58, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will be sure to do that. Jonas Vinther (talk) 17:36, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Your addition to The Lives of a Bengal Lancer (book) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 19:17, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Recovery (Eminem album)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Recovery (Eminem album) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 19:41, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Re: My apologies
No problem, no offense taken, maybe I came off harsh back then too. By looking at your contributions it seems you have been making thousands of useful edits here at Wikipedia, and in the end, that's what matters most. Keep up the good work, and don't hesitate to contact me if you need any help. Victão Lopes Fala! 20:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
- Much appreciated. :) Jonas Vinther (talk) 20:27, 3 July 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Recovery (Eminem album) failed
The article Recovery (Eminem album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Recovery (Eminem album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SNUGGUMS -- SNUGGUMS (talk) 08:02, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Jonas, sorry this article had to fail its third GAN. The article is going to need extensive work before renomination, should go through a peer review and perhaps the Guild of Copy Editors. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 08:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Verdun
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Verdun you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 15:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Animal welfare during World War II, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Express. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Animal welfare during World War II for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Animal welfare during World War II is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal welfare during World War II until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tchaliburton (talk) 17:34, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Enforced retirement for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enforced retirement is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enforced retirement until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tchaliburton (talk) 17:45, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Sabro Korsvejskolen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sabro Korsvejskolen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabro Korsvejskolen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tchaliburton (talk) 15:36, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 15:50, 2 August 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Disambiguation link notification for August 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Hitler's Warriors
- added a link pointing to 6th Army
- World War II Behind Closed Doors: Stalin, the Nazis and the West
- added a link pointing to Andrew Williams
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
Preserving edit history
Hi! I just wanted to make extra sure that you saw what the closing administrator said about preserving edit history, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal welfare during World War II. You should use the version he created for you, and not the one in your sandbox. Good luck! --Tryptofish (talk) 20:26, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, I see; Thank you, Tryptofish. Jonas Vinther (talk) 20:42, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Battle of Verdun
The article Battle of Verdun you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Verdun for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 12:20, 18 August 2014 (UTC)