Recent edits to Loretta Young

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Loretta Young, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 00:16, 11 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

November 2020

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Removal of Confederate monuments and memorials has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Removal of Confederate monuments and memorials, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Removal of Confederate monuments and memorials. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism, as you did at Robert E. Lee. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 07:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  EvergreenFir (talk) 07:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Evergreen: Fir

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Dktumlinson56 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have been severely ill for a long time, but with the stress of this year, my illness had become unmanageable and I ended up in the ER 5 times, and hospitalized twice, and on the second time I had abdominal surgery to correct my illness, and during this time someone hacked my Wikipedia page and evidently edited some pages, which I knew nothing about until weeks after I go out of the hospital and unfortunately Evergreen Fir took the unfortunate opportunity to block my page forever, and I think that is wrong and too severe. I have been trying to communicate with this person, but with no success. I hope someone will reach out and help me, and talk to this person and get me unblocked, because I have done nothing wrong.

Decline reason:

Leaving aside the comment below for the moment, either you are telling the truth, in which case you should remain blocked because your account was hacked and thus compromised, or you are being dishonest, in which case you should remain blocked for choosing to be dishonest instead of acknowledging your vandalism. The CU's comment below suggests to me the latter, but it doesn't really matter. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 02:09, 4 January 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Blocked for no reason

edit

You called me dishonest and that I would not be unblocked until I confessed my guilt, but I can not do that, because I am not guilty, and I have the massive medical bills and surgical scars to prove my statements of being severely ill, and if you would like copies and pictures of that proof, just say so, but let me warn you it is not a pretty site, actually it is quite unpleasant, and down right gross, and I will be debt for years too come, paying off the medical bills, and while I was hospitalized for the 5th time, anyone and anybody could of used my computer while I was not there, and being as sick as I was, I could of cared less who was doing what too whom. Sorry, but that is the whole naked full truth.

Blocked

edit

Also, the 3rd and 4th time I was hospitalized, my computer was unlocked, open and anyone could of used it then too, but I don't know who did, so I still can not confess too who used it, because I really and truly do not know. If, I did I would tell you, but I don't, so I still can not confess, because I have nothing to confess about, sorry, but that is the truth, and I will not confess too something I did not do. If, I had I would so you would unblock me, but I just can't, sorry, because I am not guilty of Vandalism, maybe negligence for leaving my computer and available, which I don't usually do, but pleading guilty to being too sick too care, I am guilty of that, sorry.