Your submission at AfC Fencing in Namibia was accepted

edit
 
Fencing in Namibia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:03, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nice work! But a few tips:

  • Don't use "Mr.", and avoid subjective words like "kind", "generous" etc. See WP:Neutrality
  • If you are in Windhoek, can you take a good photograph for the article?
  • Don't forget to add WP:Wikilinks

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:05, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fencing in Namibia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • In 2010 the NFF sent the first Namibian fencer to an [[Fédération Internationale d'Escrime|FIE] governed competition.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:53, 21 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

File permission problem with File:Namibian Fencing Federation Logo.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Namibian Fencing Federation Logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:26, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Fencing in Namibia

edit
 

The article Fencing in Namibia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTGUIDE, no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sungodtemple (talk) 14:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply