User talk:Dijxtra/Archive 1

Welcome and about images

Hi there Dijxtra, welcome to Wikipedia :)

Unfortunately there's no trivial way to use the image from sl: on en:. However, what you can do is not much harder: take the sl: image, upload it to http://commons.wikimedia.org/ (just create an account over there as well), and then link it from any Wikipedia, including en:.

If you have any other questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Good luck. --Joy [shallot] 2 July 2005 15:54 (UTC)

Sigs

A sig is not encyclopedic. WillC 18:19, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

Of course, but a quote is. And the quote in question is a famous one. I find it a quote worth remembering. --Dijxtra 18:45, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

• Fuck the Wikipedia double standard. WillC 23:12, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

I beg your pardon? --Dijxtra 07:06, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

Croatia-stubs

I just saw that you created Template:Croatia-stub and the Category:Croatia-related stubs. The stub template and the stub category seem to be fine: they are well defined and well formatted. However, there is a procedure for the creation of stub templates. You can read more about it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals#Proposing new stubs - procedure. Just thought I'd let you know. Other than that, keep contributing to Wikipedia :) Aecis 18:44, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Oh. Damn. Sorry, didn't know there's a procedure. What do I do now, just leave things as they are becouse stub template is already created, or should I go and propose already existing stub category? --Dijxtra 07:46, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

You can leave everything as it is. The template and the category have been created, and they have been created properly. They make sense, they are being used, and there are enough articles to fill the Category:Croatia-related stubs. So there is no problem with that. It's just something to keep in mind the next time you want to create a template and category. Aecis 11:39, 9 September 2005 (UTC) PS. Did you know you are living in one of the most beautiful cities in Europe ;)

Weeeell, I do consider it one of the most beautiful cities in Europe, but it's really nice to hear something like that from a guy living in the Netherlands since my sister went there and says you have a really beautiful contry :-) --Dijxtra 12:45, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Re: Croatia-related stubs

Yup, it was a good idea. You missed WP:WSS/P, but it's not a big deal given that you didn't screw it up :)

Excessive stubbing isn't bad. There's also a method to hide the excessive stub notices, something like adding a <div> with a class set to something like "visibility: none", I can't remember exactly where I saw it but it was okay.

More importantly, double-stubbing is perfectly okay for articles with just a semi-generic stub marker such as bio-stub, and where the most specific categories don't exist. For example a stub article about a Croatian nurse would deserve listing in both med-bio-stub and Croatia-bio-stub.

I don't think we have a single venue for Croatian issues. I'd suggest hr:Wikipedia:Kafić as a meager substitute, but it's not really pertinent to en:. Maybe we could start a Croatian WikiProject here just for this purpose :) --Joy [shallot] 19:13, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

No, WikiProject doesn't have sence... but, I was thinking about that and figured out that really great place to put Croatia-related notices is Category_talk:Wikipedians_in_Croatia. But, then again, the fact that there are only 7 users in that category is rather sad and I think that need for a page about Croatian stuff won't be needed for quite a some time since there isn't enough pepople to use it :-\ --Dijxtra 19:42, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

It occurs to me that I used the wrong term. There's the option of having a country portal, and a country noticeboard. --Joy [shallot] 13:25, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Hm. Are you sure there's enough intrest for that? I mean, if it's only two of us into it, the portal might turn out to be a bit static... What do you think, how many people could be intrested to colaborate? --Dijxtra 16:43, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Yes, like I said, a country noticeboard would be okay. --Joy <small><small>&#91;shallot&#93;</small></small>

Reproduction of Croatian currency

I made three changes:

1. "itself" (minor error)
2. "film" -> "film (movie)" (maybe to omit film and leave only "movie"?)
3. "central place" -> I reformulated part of sentence

I edited article directly, to spare you time :-), as that's usual on Wikipedia. SpeedyGonsales 12:22, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! Of course you edited it, what else could you do... sorry for bugging you to lecture my work, won-t do that again, this one was rather important... ---Dijxtra 13:01, 16 September 2005 (UTC)

Kein problem :-) SpeedyGonsales 15:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

.yu bills

Sorry, that was a badly worlded sentence. I was looking for confirmation that they were in fact PD. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 17:36, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright problem RE: Image:Opstinebgd.gif

Well, since the image is now available on Commons under GNU-FDL, and nothing is linked to it anymore, you can erase it (or ask some admin to do that). -- Obradović Goran (ta^lk 19:27, 13 October 2005 (UTC)

From HolyRomanEmperor

Was the Cetina-Una line the historic border of Croats and Serbs in the Early Medieval Ages? HolyRomanEmperor 16:35, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Got no clue. I overslept those classes in school, hm, I'll have to learn that of history... Try asking Joy. --Dijxtra 18:06, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Sevdalinka & Johnny Stulic

I'm not sure about the quote on Azra band you keep on restoring on Sevdalinka page about "Ja se zovem el Muhamed...". Do you have any sources to cite? Have you seen recent documentary about Johnny on HTV2? (if you didn't, you missed a lot -- it was excellent). There, his old friend (sorry, forgot the nickname) told a story about his "prophecy" that his daughter will be called Azra, as well as Johnny's band, both of which ultimatively came true. He did not refer neither to the Sevdalinka passage quoted nor to Heine's poem, but rather to the original arabish source of name Azra ("virginal", "feminine", "levitating").

Yes, I saw "Kad Miki kaže da se boji", and yes I agree it is a fabolous documentarian, but the fact this documentarian doesn't mention Heine's song doesn't mean this piece of information is wrong.

I think we should delete the paragraph in question, as it appears to be unverified (unverifiable?) unless you have some more credible sources.Duja 10:18, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Well, I do have more credible sources. Let's start by wikipedia itself: article about Azra before I did any editing there, article about Johnny on Croatian wikipedia, which I didn't edit, then let's do some googleing: [1], [2]. And, at last, you can try to solve this quiz and see which is correct answer to question "Kako se i zasto Dzoni opredjelio da ime benda bude AZRA?". But, the source I consider most credible is one I'm not able to quote, which is my dear friend Buljo who knows just about everything about Johnny ;-) If you wish, I'll mail you some articles about Johnny I have on my hard drive which confirm this information... --Dijxtra 11:02, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

E ako Buljo kaže... :-). But wait, I don't get it -- you restored this statement although all the sources you cite refer to Heine's poem??? Or am I missing something? Duja 11:23, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Googling... I did miss something; the quoted text is from Heine's poem although it isn't obvious from the text. Probably that's why the previous editor deleted it.Duja 11:27, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Right. See, Heine wrote a poem (Der Asra) which was to resemble eastern/Ottoman poems (I'm not quite sure wether he had precisely sevdalinka in mind, but it could be). He wrote it in German, of course. Then Aleksa Šantić translated that poem to Serbo-Croatian language, and named it "Kraj tanahna šadrvana". As this song was written to resemble sevdalinka, or some other genre close to sevdalinka, upon translating Der Asra to Serbo-Croatian, the song was a perfect sevdalinka. So, somebody (I lack this piece of information, and would trade my kidney for it) made music for it, and it now we have one of mos beautiful sevdalinkas - written by a German poet. Among others, Štulić was to impressed by it, and decided to name his band - Azra. --Dijxtra 13:40, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Actually, this site attributes the translation to Safvet-beg Bašagić (not that it matters much) who unfortunately doesn't have an English Wikipedia entry. Too bad that these Bosniak guys lurking over here spend too much time on proving that Bosniaks originate from amoebas instead of writing articles on their own history and culture.Duja 14:41, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Oh, it does matter! Wikipedia is all about being precise. Thank you for the hint, I corrected the Azra article. And now another very important thing advice for you. I you think something offensive about a man or a group of people, don't mention it on wikipedia. Now, I think some people on wikipedia are just jerks and should be lobotomised. But, you just don't say such a thing on wikipedia. If somebody is a jerk, that's bad, but he is allowed to be a jerk as long as he is not vandalizing. Sooooo, in future, try not to make such statements about Bosniaks, no matter if they are in fact true :-) --Dijxtra 15:00, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

I didn't mean all Bosniaks, of course. I just noticed that, at least on the pages I watch (to name Bosniaks, Serbo-Croatian language, Bosnians), the highest percent of vandalism and POV statements comes from their side, while e.g. most of work on "their" Sevdalinka page was done by you and myself. Still, I'll have your advice in mind and try to &%#$ restrain myself... Duja 15:24, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

Bijelo Dugme

Unless I'm missing something, there's no propaganda in the article on Bijelo Dugme, you're just removing links and using incorrect English. Could you point out the specifics of what you see as "propaganda"? --estavisti 17:22, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

See article's talk page. --Dijxtra 17:23, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing that up. No problem with your edits now that you've explained the reasoning. If only all disputes were so easy to solve. --estavisti 20:08, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Re: User:203.26.177.2

Hi Dijxtra —

I left a long message on the contributor's talk page. In the future, this is probably the best way of resolving these issues. I see he's been using almost only Talk pages for a while now, so I can't see him as causing much trouble at the moment.

— Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 17:44, 13 November 2005 (UTC)

Re: User:203.26.177.2

Hi there,

I am the mysterious and potentially troublesome user 203.26.177.2 - and not a "he", but a "she" (yes, there are some of us around :-))). Sorry for any problems I may have caused, I have been editing the List of Bosnians for a month or so, and have (naturally!) come across some interesting discussion re Ivo Andric and Josip Broz to which I have contributed (more or less emotionally, :-))), and inserting comments where relevant. I don't know if I may have broken some rules in the process, I am very, very new to this and don't really know what the rules and regulations are. Please feel free to leave me messages and I'll correct my conduct accordingly, :-). Thanks! 02:04, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Euro-stub

Why are you putting {{Euro-stub}} on several pages related with Yu-musicians? IMO this is a pretty stup meaningless stub to have; why not {{Musician-stub}} instead? Duja 13:03, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

See here. I'd like to create a stub category for Bosnia and Herzegovina, but most of articles that would be included in that stub category are not marked as stubs. So the guy said I should put them in {{Euro-stub}}, because if stub category for BiH doesn't exist, I have to use eurostub, for BiH is in Europe. Then when they decide I overcrowded Euro-stub with BiH-related stubs, we'll create BiH-related stub category and move all those articles to that new category. So, if you'd like to help me get a new stub category for BiH stubs, go and add stubs about BiH to {{Euro-stub}}. --Dijxtra 13:32, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

But wasn't it easier to create {{Bosnia-stub}} template, like I just did, and attach that to appropriate pages? In this way, you'll do the job twice. (Unless you write an extra smart bot :-)) Duja 15:15, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

No, it wasn't easier, because now everybody will get annoyed because there is a procedure which has to be followed. And you just broke it. Read this. I don't know what will happen now as people usually follow procedures... They'll probably revert your work... or something. I don't know, let's see. But, if you ask me, I vote for renaming of that template to either {{Bosnia and Herzegovina-stub}} or {{BiH-stub}} (which allready exists, and now we have 2 different stub categories for Bosnia. This is a reason why we have procedures, not to create chaos of the kind you just created ;-) ) --Dijxtra 21:17, 22 November 2005 (UTC)

OK, my bad, but please don't be so harsh -- I made no damage or "chaos". In effect, I created a new orphaned page. I obviously did not know about the procedure.

BiH-stub is not linked to from anywhere (and the procedure has not been followed for it either). It could be un-redirected, and make Bosnia-stub redirecting to it. I'll make a followup there. Duja 07:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

OK, OK, sorry, I appologize, I agree I was too harsh :-) I tend to overreact sometimes. Sorry if I insulted you or something. :-| But, it's really nice of you that you are trying to help and I appreciate that. :-)

Now, don't get me wrong, but I noticed you put an {{Euro-stub}} on Safvet-beg Bašagić article... now, I'm sorry I have to correct you yet again, but as you see, there already is an {{Euro-writer-stub}} on that article, and since {{Euro-writer-stub}} is sub-category of {{Euro-stub}}, that's a redundancy :-) So, if a Bosnian page is in some kind of {{Euro-*-stub}} category, you don't need to mark it as {{Euro-stub}}. When we come to the counting part (when we mark all Bosnian stubs as {{Euro-stub}} or some of {{Euro-*-stub}}, we have to count them and make sure there's 60 of them to get ourselves a new stub category), we'll count in all of sub-categories of {{Euro-stub}}. So, the double categorising is redundant, but I'm glad to see you are helping :-) It's nice to see I'm not the only one trying to clear out the Bosnian situation... --Dijxtra 08:38, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

I realized that I shouldn't do that just after Safvet-Beg Basagic article, but I fell into multi-tasking and didn't revert it. Initially, I thought it would be easier to have them all listed under Category:Europe stubs but I realized it wasn't your intention. I'm reverting it now. Duja 09:10, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Good. Again, thanks for help! --Dijxtra 09:16, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

In an attempt to make up for my, erm, blunders, I moved most (all?) articles from {{Euro-stub}} to {{BiH-stub}} or {{BiH-bio-stub}}. Please check it out and let me know if I made any errors. (But don't tell me that I did everything wrong, because I'll seek you to kill :-) ) As you probably noticed, I also left a message on Talk:Nenad Janković. Duja 09:53, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

You did everything fine :-) I agree with your Nele Karajlić critics, and will act accordingly. --Dijxtra 10:26, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

requested moves

When requesting moves, please create a place of discussion on the talk page of the article you wish to move, as instructed at WP:RM. People can't vote or discuss the move unless this is done.—jiy (talk) 08:03, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't see it. Though, it's quicker to know where to comment and vote when using the standard heading ("Requested move") and structure, in conjunction with {{move}} in my opinion. The template will also add the talk page to Category:Requested moves.—jiy (talk) 21:01, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Re:Moving of List of Bosnians

Thanks for reminding me to respond to my own renaming request. :-P --Thewanderer 21:32, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Yugoslav dinar

about when Montenegro dropped the dinar, I added a link on the Yugoslav dinar page for a bbc news article which states that it happened on November 13, 2000.

about dinara vs. dinars, I'm not sure. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style page mentions that for article titles, the local name of the currency should be used. Pluralization within the article is not dealt with. To me (as a native English speaker, who is biased by being a world coin collector, and believes it's silly that we don't call Italy Italia for example), dinars looks wrong. I've asked for input at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics#denomination pluralization. Please feel free to comment there.

about how I found out about the Montenegrin perper: first I read some Yugoslavian history at answers.com (linked on the Yugoslav dinar page) to find out that Montenegro had been an independent state before WWI (this is also where I learned about how Yugoslavia was split during WWII). Then, I looked in a book I have, The Standard Catalog of World Coins, to find out what their currency was. Turns out there was already a page for Perper, so I linked to it.

finally, about the dinar being used also in Montenegro until 2001, I think it would be great to add that information. I'm not sure how it could be put into the infobox, but if you have an idea, go for it. Otherwise, just putting it into the article would be useful. Mom2jandk 18:48, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Yugoslav dinar [2]

Dijxtra, I reckon that the plural 'Dinara' should be used. You have to make it clear whether it is Serbian Dinara, Croatian Dinara, or Bosnian Dinara. As I am a numismatist, I can understand why Dinara is preferred to Dinars. To me, Dinars sounds like the currencies of Jordan, Iraq,& Kuwait. - (Aidan Work 06:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC))

Well, the name of the currency is the same. It's Dinar. My oppinion is stil very firm: I think dinars should be used because that's how it is most commonly used in English. See [here], I just wrote my most recent thinking on that topic. --Dijxtra 13:12, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

French Foreign League

I believe you are wrong about Gotovina for a very simple reason. Most visitors to the Hague stay. This is known and efficient. It takes a long time to bring them there, and to let them go is a headless waste. Now, they indicted Gotovina because Tudman was dead; but they would not have indicted him, and he would not have run, if they didn't mean to toss him in jail. It also comes across to me that to presume a conspiracy here is a slight bit more than is worth undertaking, since dead men are better off lying in their graves. Maybe they started to investigate him before Tudman died and now he's only a straw man...but the Croatian government knows very well what will happen to him, and shall act in accordance. Whatever the case, we'll see, when the trial comes about. --VKokielov 17:04, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Well, I might be wrong. I'm not very attached to my oppinion, really. I don't care, I know that I don't have all that much real facts on my hands and my oppinion is poorly argumented one. So I won't be surprised if it changes. But, one thing is important. Wikipedia is not about opinions but facts. That's why my opinion doesn't influence my contributions... or at least I try realy hard not to let it influence them ;-) --Dijxtra 22:55, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

Inache

Ti si programist? I ja jesam.  :)

Izvini za neuctivost. --VKokielov 07:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Programer ;-) Nesto u tom stilu... na nasem studiju nas maltretiraju sa mnogo vise toga. Programiranje je samo dio toga cime se bavim... trenutacno radimo na projektu dizajniranja bus arbitera za viseprocesorski sustav :-) E, a, di ti zivis? U Rusiji? De, pojasni, kako to da govoris Ruski kao materinji i znas ponesto od ovih nasih jezika? :-) --Dijxtra 11:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Ovih vasih!  ;) Naucio sam se, jer sam imao zelju i nesto vremena. Nije tesko...mozes probati i sam. Ja zivim u SADu, ali govorim ruski. Ima nas dosta ovdje. 750,000 po zadnjem popisu. (Vas ima oko 250,000). --VKokielov 17:39, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

A zasto si krenuo uciti bas te jezike, a ne recimo Francuski ili Arapski ili Kineski? BTW, zanimljivo, bas mi se danas na ICQ javila jedna Ruskinja iz Arkhangelska :-) --Dijxtra 17:52, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Zeznut sam.

Ovo je rjecca koju sam naucio od nekih nasih kolega tamo na hrvatskoj Wikipediji.  ;)

Ali stvarno, nije meni bilo tada do francuskog ili ar--arr-arrrapskog (zabiljezit ces, da sam Zidov, ako opet promotris user page). Uostalom, francuski manje vise znam od skolskog doba. --VKokielov 19:52, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Ah, nisi stavio francuski na popis ;-) A za arapski - sorry, ako covjek nauci hrvatski iz zabave, onda ne pretpostavljas da je zidov samo zato sto zna nesto hebrejskog ;-) BTW, svaka cast, moja velika zelja je nauciti sto vise jezika... ljudskih, programskih jezika znam i vise nego dovoljno :-) --Dijxtra 20:43, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

---

Ti programski jezici su svi uostalom jednaki.  ;) Mislim, da nije mudro inace ih razumjeti, jer, usprkos svim pjesmama u zraku naseg programistskog svjeta, matematika je nauka koja voli ujedinenje, a programiranje je na kraju krajeva matematika.  :) --VKokielov 22:30, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Hm... C, LISP, SQL... nije bas da su svi jednaki ;-) --Dijxtra 23:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Ne o tome je rijec, nego o tome da iskusni programer moze preci s jedne sisteme na drugu gotovo odmah. To je poslijedica univerzalnosti zakona koje ipak vladaju sto se tice izracuna (computation). A sto se odnosi do C i LISPa, reci cu samo da negdje duboko iza svakog C se krije jedan LISP.  ;) Ne obrnuto. LISP moze da se cini mnogo kompleksniji (zeznutiji?) od C-ja, ali u isto vrijeme LISP je vrlo elegantan i vrlo generalan opis onoga sto se desava u racunalu, a naime zbog toga on je bolji nego ishta drugo u sluzbi "meta-jezika". --VKokielov 23:49, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Znam... zato upravo ucim LISP ;-) Jako mi se dopada... --Dijxtra 08:27, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Unfree images

Nikola, thanks for uploading those images of Ante Gotovina, but please note that they aren't safe for us to use (fair use isn't sufficient, unfortunately). I'll have to delete them as copyright violations. Could you see if you can find any copyright-safe images that we can use? -- ChrisO 17:55, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

See Talk:Ante_Gotovina#Unfree_images. --Dijxtra 18:11, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

HD question

I've answered your question on the Help desk. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:17, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Thanks! --Dijxtra 10:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

Proposal for adminship

My friend, I proposed you for an admin for pretty much obvious reasons:

I hope you will get nominated. Keep up on good work in any case. All the best, Duja 08:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC).

Thank you very much for the nomination, but I must decline it at this time. This nomination took me by surprise, as I never even thought about me becoming a Wikipedia administrator. But now that you nominated me, I took a few days to consider this posibility and the conclusion I reached is that it is not the time yet for me to accept this nomination. I am still learning how to use Wikipedia in a proper way (I just recently started to quote my sources, for example), and I am not familiar with the way adminship works. It would be quite wrong for me to became an admin when I don't know what that means. Second thing is: my articles are not good display of what I can do. I never had reviewers in mind when writting my articles, and if I accepted this nomination, my articles would be under the spotlight... and, I feel they are not ready for that just yet.

Therefore, I ask you to accept my decline of the nomination, and nominate me again in 2-3 months time, if you wish. In following weeks I will examine tasks of adminship and learn the things every candidate for an admin has to know. I will raise my article quality to the level I find appropriate too, so that I can feel comfortable with others reading and evaluating my work. Two months should be enough time for me to feel confident I'm worthy of the status of admin. I hope you are not offended by my decline and wish to thank you once again for this great compliment you gave me and assure you I will accept your nomination if you wish to re-nominate me in 2-3 months time. --Dijxtra 19:25, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

No problem certainly; keep up on good work & we'll keep in touch. Duja 10:51, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

input request

Would you mind looking in on Talk:Jesus H. Christ#"Bored church attendees"? Thanks for your time. Tomer^talk 00:29, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

Aleksandar Karađorđević or Alexander, Crown Prince of Yugoslavia

Any comments? Zocky 20:50, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

Vesa / Gildyshow / Projects

Hi Dijxtra, I see that you picked up on the sockpuppetry of User:Vesa and User:Gildyshow. He's added another, User:Projects. And he's vowed to "stay and fight" for the "truth". So, do you know what happens next? Is there a procedure? Sorry, I'm still pretty new and I don't know much about admininstration stuff. Should someone take a next step? I will if needed, if I knew what it was. Or has that already been done? I think this guy is pretty clearly a flat-out vandal and needs to be removed ASAP. Thanks for your time, sorry to bug you. Herostratus 00:20, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

You're not buging me, I'm here because I want to :-) I'll go and read Wikipedia guidelines to see what's to be done with suspected sock puppets, and I'll act accordingly. Keep up the good work! --Dijxtra 09:39, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Projects.2FVesa Fred Bauder 22:16, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Have you spotted this I do not appreciate being linked to this maniac Dijxtra who may have links to neo nazis... on User_talk:Projects? Just thought I'd point it out. -localzuk 19:48, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I'm prepared to put my name to the requst for arbitration. -localzuk 21:00, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Your SQL query

Your SQL query turned up nothing, the one you posted on meta back in September. Let me know if you need another query. --AllyUnion (talk) 05:08, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Ah, cur is depreciated on en... fixed, re-running the query. --AllyUnion (talk) 08:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Nevermind... the whole schema has been flushed out the door. --AllyUnion (talk) 08:47, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

Darn. Then I'll rewrite the query. --Dijxtra 09:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC)