Desmoquattro

ASNT

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of ASNT, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.asnt.org/asnt/asnt.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ASNT

A tag has been placed on ASNT requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Llama! (talk) 10:32, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

December 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Shearography. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful, then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. There is an appeal for discussion at Talk:Shearography, but so far nobody has articulated any reason why one image and link ordering might be better than another. Would you please explain your preference over there instead of continually reverting? - 2/0 (cont.) 16:14, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Shearography Edit War Background

I can explain the background of the edit war: I created the first version of shearography "Desmoquattro" back in 26 of March 2009. It took some time before another manufacturer of shearography discovered it and completely messed it up just to get some pictures of the own equipment there WITHOUT paying any respect to formatting etc wich suffered a lot:

- please see revision 19:52, 6 June 2010) made by user Shearo.

I re-edited the page (10:01, 14 June 2010 Desmoquattro) to make it look reasonable good again with formatting and everything and also made a compromise that both of our equipments are on display.

This edit was messed up again from user Shearo (06:42, 30 June 2010 Shearo) without any respect to format, just to bring up pictures of the own producs. I reseted it again to a clean version. But once again it was destroyed by (15:37, 29 July 2010 Shearo) In Octber 2010, it reached a new level when user shearo (or he/she behind a IP) started to change the hypertext on the external links so "Dantec Dynamics" could not be clicked on for more information. This is in my opinion sever and after this the "war" started.

I have tried to keep the page clean and not use it as some marketing tool, and not destroying for any one else editing it for developing it. Hope that we can find a solution here and stop this destructive edits done from user Shearo (or the anonomyss IP he/she is using)

Please discuss this on the Talk Page of the article. It's probably better there. Stephenb (Talk) 17:20, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

And please stop removing the {{pp-semi|expiry=15 March 2011|small=yes}} tag at the beginning of the article. It doesn't actually affect the status of the article being uneditable by anonymous users until next March, but it does alert editors to the semi-locked status Stephenb (Talk) 17:22, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shearography

The article Shearography has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:N - no third party sources found in gnews search

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Active Banana (^bananaphone 17:32, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Shearography for deletion

The article Shearography is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shearography until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Active Banana (^bananaphone 17:51, 21 December 2010 (UTC)