Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Howon Park (August 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Utopes (talk / cont) 11:54, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Dentonslee! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes (talk / cont) 11:54, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Son Ho-Yun has been accepted

edit
 
Son Ho-Yun, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 08:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024

edit
 

Hello Dentonslee. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dentonslee. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Dentonslee|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:53, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

I am not directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. I am not related to the organization at all, am entirely unpaid and was formerly an unpaid intern at Dentons.
I want to write as neutral an article possible for Nicholas Park, as I noticed in my time there that he is the only member of senior leadership that did not have a wikipedia article. Username was a mistake in hindsight.
Please let me know if there are any steps I can take to writing a neutral article, or if any language was promotional because that is not my intention. Dsqwarfex is the other ID I used on my desktop because I couldn't remember the password to this account. I would be happy to just use that account if possible. Dentonslee (talk) 06:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, Dentonslee, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Dsqwarfex (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:56, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I would prefer to use this account Dsqwarfex (talk) 14:30, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Just bumping this to see if there's anything I can do! Dentonslee (talk) 05:27, 25 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nicholas Howon Park (October 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thilsebatti (talk) 17:30, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply