CS1 error on History of the Arabs edit

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of the Arabs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Walser migrations has been accepted edit

 
Walser migrations, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Denninithan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 06:47, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

How to respond to having an article edit of yours reverted edit

Hi, Denninithan. Seeking consensus with other editors about article content is a key feature of Wikipedia's collaborative editing environment. When an edit you make is reverted by another editor, if you still believe your original edit was correct, you should go to the Talk page of the article to discuss the content disagreement with the other editor, and with any other editors interested in the topic. Simply reinserting your disputed content because you believe your reasoning was correct is contrary to consensus operation, and without the principle of consensus there would be chaos, with editors simply reverting each other endlessly and whipsawing the article back and forth, with no settlement of the underlying issue, and making no progress in developing the article. This type of back-and-forth reversion has a name at Wikipedia, and it's called Edit-warring, and is something to be avoided.

With respect to my removal of your edit at Judaeo-Romance languages, what you did next was to add the disputed content back into the article again, whereas what you should have done is to go to Talk:Judaeo-Romance languages and make your case there about why your approach is the correct one. I give you credit for going to my Talk page and raising the issue there, but 1) no one will see it there, and 2) you didn't wait for a response, you just reinserted the disputed content back into the article. This is how edit-warring gets started.

I won't remove your content again for now, to avoid spurring it even more into edit-warring territory. However that doesn't mean you can just ignore the situation, because a content disagreement still remains. I'll repeat here the offer I made to you on my Talk page to move your comment to Talk:Judaeo-Romance languages where any content disagreement can be discussed, and where other interested editors may find it and join in.

Going forward, if an editor reverts an article edit of yours, please follow dispute resolution guidelines and start a discussion on the article Talk page, instead of reverting back and insisting on your version. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

By mutual agreement at my user talk page, that discussion can now be followed here. Mathglot (talk) 00:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 19 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Judeo-Shirazi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 edit

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Constantine, Algeria. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 07:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The information I added in my addition was correct and properly cited you likely accidentally missed that and made a mistake. If you want proof you can check the revision history and look at my edit Denninithan (talk) 23:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply