Your submission at Articles for creation: Sania Sahu: The victim of sex racket (May 3) edit

 
Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: I'm sorry but this topic is not notable and also reads like an essay/story.
ToadetteEdit! 07:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Deeprahul07! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ToadetteEdit! 07:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Bruce1ee. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Gym have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 13:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Business idea. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. —Bruce1eetalk 13:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. [1][2] MrOllie (talk) 13:46, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Weight loss. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. —Bruce1eetalk 15:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 17:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply