Ddavis23

Concern regarding Draft:Leonie Huie

Hello, Ddavis23. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Leonie Huie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Leonie Huie

Hello, Ddavis23. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Leonie Huie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:41, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Rebecca Lynn Pope

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Rebecca Lynn Pope, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 16:33, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Matte Collection

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Matte Collection, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 16:34, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Regarding Acoount Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ddavis23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked as I am not a page of promotion or spam. I am fairly new to the platform and reviewed other pages and tutorials before creating my drafts and was unaware of any errors that were made. I was creating pages on behalf of notable individuals and brands who do not have a published page. My drafts were there to make sure that I could review any mishaps before they were submitted for live placement. I can see that I received feedback but was not given a chance to fix them before I was indefinitely blocked. I would like to have a chance to correct any errors on my drafts that may have caused me to be flagged. If not I would like access to the material for future reference to ensure these mistakes do not occur again.

Decline reason:

What you are describing is the very definition of promotion and spam. We have no interest in you doing this. Yamla (talk) 21:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ddavis23 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do sincerely apologize for the mistakes that I made that went against the guidelines. My intentions were not to violate the rules of editing articles. I am fairly new to the platform and am still learning how to edit articles. I have been actively educating myself so that I fully understand the proper protocol for editing. If possible, I would love an opportunity to fix my errors so that I know how to go about editing moving forward. Again, I do apologize for my mistakes as there was no harm intended. Ddavis23 (talk) 13:12, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your apology is appreciated, but to remove the block we must be assured that the problematic edits will not repeat. You don't seem to indicate that you will do anything other than what got you blocked, so there are no grounds to remove it. If you have educated yourself, please demonstrate your understanding by describing any connections you have to the subjects of your edits, what was wrong with your edits, what you will do differently, and what topics you will edit about if unblocked. 331dot (talk) 13:52, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.