Hello! My name is David Camp, and I am in the process of creating an article about my wife, poet and visual artist Lauren Camp. I understand there is the potential for conflict of interest since I am close to her, but I believe I can produce a straightforward, unbiased piece. Furthermore, because of my closeness, I have access to the most comprehensive and accurate information about her. I hope you all will give me a chance to get this started.

Thank you. Davidmukamalcamp (talk) 02:29, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Help me! edit

Dear Whomever,

I've got a good start on an article I'm writing about my wife, an artist and poet who I believe to be notable. I know that articles are not supposed to be written by someone close to the subject, but please consider that because I am close to the subject, I have access to the most comprehensive and accurate information about her.

I am asking for help at this point because I'd be grateful for a quick glance at the piece (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lauren_Camp) just to get an opinion about its objectivity, and if is remotely possible that when I have completed my first draft, it might pass muster.

Do I have a chance? Should I continue?

Thank you very much, David Camp Davidmukamalcamp (talk) 00:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to leave your request for help open so you get more feedback. The big concern I have is that you do not have any independent reliable sources cited in your draft. The one reference is to a work co-written by her. —C.Fred (talk) 00:31, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
I agree with C.Fred. Searching for the person's name on google also failed to show any independent reliable sources that have written about her (Wikipedia requires multiple). I highly doubt that the subject meets the notability criteria, unless there is truly a large amount of coverage from independent sources that I have missed. If that isn't the case, I recommend not continuing to complete the draft. Darylgolden(talk) Ping when replying 01:33, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, @C.Fred and Darylgolden: I was hoping the reviews for two of her books (now correctly cited) later in the article would help with these concerns. They are linked to independent sites on the web. Are these not acceptable? Also, I have documentation about the exhibits I listed in the form of printed posters and museum postcards. Is there a way I can use these to prove the veracity of my article? Davidmukamalcamp (talk) 02:34, 10 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Camp (December 18) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 09:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Davidmukamalcamp, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 09:44, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Camp (January 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Drover's Wife was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:06, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Camp (January 27) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caorongjin was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Caorongjin (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lauren Camp has been accepted edit

 
Lauren Camp, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 00:59, 16 March 2018 (UTC)Reply