Davedolphin

Your edits to Tate Publishing & Enterprises

I thought I should let you know that I started a thread about you at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Please also see our rules about repeatedly undoing edits. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tate Publishing & Enterprises, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 14:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Tate Publishing & Enterprises. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. -- Atama頭 17:15, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interest

You have a clear conflict of interest with Tate Publishing & Enterprises. Please use the talk page to discuss any changes you may wish to make. Teapotgeorge^Talk 19:46, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Repeated reverted edits on Tate Publishing & Enterprises

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing. --Deskford (talk) 20:20, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Please discuss your issues on the article's talk page rather than repeatedly reverting changes. Only this way will we reach any kind of agreement. Thanks. --Deskford (talk) 22:49, 1 October 2009 (UTC)