Your submission at Articles for creation: Dans la légende (January 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
joe deckertalk 03:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Dani tefe, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! joe deckertalk 03:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Panda (song) edit

Do not revert users without an explanation. Do you see a streaming chart for any other country on Panda (song)? No. Streaming charts factor into every main singles chart nowadays, and therefore, the French Streaming chart peak is irrelevant as it charted on the overall chart in the country. Only if a song has not charted on the main singles chart should you be adding the Streaming chart peak for a country. Brush up on some WP:CHART guidelines, please. Ss112 21:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Panda (song).

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. I told you not to revert somebody without an explanation. Ss112 02:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't matter that the SNEP streaming chart is official. I wasn't denying it was. Just because something's official, does not mean we put it on Wikipedia. If you keep edit warring over your inclusion of streaming charts when it has been explained to you that they are component charts and not relevant per the fact that they are not included for any other country, you will be reported for disruptive editing and not getting the message. Thank you. Ss112 02:33, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

I understand; still... edit

I understand what you said perfectly. Nobody would deny that the SNEP streaming chart is official; I simply told you that adding a streaming chart peak while the main chart peak is already there is unnecessary, as it is a component chart and we do not do this for the US, so it should not be done for France either. Ss112 14:44, 9 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Panda (song). It does not matter. The overall French chart is on the page. You should not add the Streaming chart peak. You will be reported if you continue this disruptive editing. Ss112 06:54, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply
You're not making any kind of unique case here. We could argue every country's charts are "divided" into the download and streaming charts. France is not unique in having both. However, after both are published at snepmusique.com, a combination is published at lescharts.com and that's what we use. We don't then separate into download and streaming. No other country's charts are separated in this manner on Wikipedia, so you should not be adding it for one country. Furthermore, there is no point in reaching out for consensus on Talk:Panda (song) and Talk:Black Beatles if you're just going to continue reinstating your WP:CHART-violating changes before anybody else has said anything. Ss112 07:08, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Dans la légende edit

 

Hello, Dani tefe. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Dans la légende".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 21:46, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

July 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Gianluigi Donnarumma, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:59, 14 July 2021 (UTC)Reply