User talk:Damotclese/Archive 6

Mail

Hello, Damotclese. Please check your email – you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

Please comment on Talk:Socialism

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Socialism. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Good grief. The RFC is not formatted properly so we don't know if there are editors who are discussing the question or just one editor asking for a distinction. Regardless the question can be resolved by doing some Google searching. Damotclese (talk) 17:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of best-selling music artists

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of best-selling music artists. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 8 January 2016 (UTC) Enough editors have commented on this, I do not need to. Damotclese (talk) 16:36, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2015 Chinese stock market crash

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 Chinese stock market crash. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 14 January 2016 (UTC) An interesting subject however I'm stuck doing software work today, no time. Damotclese (talk) 17:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Smashing Pumpkins. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC) Enough editors have responded. Damotclese (talk) 05:09, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2015 Chinese stock market crash

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2015 Chinese stock market crash. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC) I don't speak Mandarin. Ha ha! Damotclese (talk) 16:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 January 2016 (UTC) I commented on that. There is no relevancy on whether someone works to stop nicotine use or not. Damotclese (talk) 16:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 26 January 2016 (UTC) RFC is not formatted properly, I will not comment. Damotclese (talk) 16:21, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Second Stage Turbine Blade

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Second Stage Turbine Blade. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 29 January 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. What constitutes a specific labeling of a style of music is often a matter of opinion, heavy rock-n-roll is often called "metal" by a great many people however others will consider "metal" to be more "angry" than traditional rock... So there is a blurring of distinction. More information is better than less. Damotclese (talk) 16:53, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:ExxonMobil

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:ExxonMobil. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 2 February 2016 (UTC) I commented on that, though I think maybe my comment got dropped in to the wrong place. :) Damotclese (talk) 17:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Need help

We need more neutral opinions here. Please help! Thanx! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:56, 3 February 2016 (UTC) Everyone who responded suggested that the drawing not be included. Damotclese (talk) 16:17, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Adeaze

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Adeaze. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC) This isn't an RFC. Damotclese (talk) 16:46, 5 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Redirect

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Redirect. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 February 2016 (UTC) Enough editors have responded to this. Damotclese (talk) 16:33, 8 February 2016 (UTC)

Laffer curve discussion

There is a discussion on Talk:Laffer curve which you may be interested in as you commented on a similar discussion at Talk:Jude Wanniski. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 14:11, 9 February 2016 (UTC) Uhg! Math! Damotclese (talk) 17:04, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Accuracy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Accuracy. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC) I don't think I'm qualified to comment on that. Damotclese (talk) 06:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Development of Grand Theft Auto V

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Development of Grand Theft Auto V. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 14 February 2016 (UTC) I don't do games, I'm not a drooling idiot. Damotclese (talk) 21:05, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Prices

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Prices. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Doctor Who serials

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of Doctor Who serials. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 21 February 2016 (UTC) Enough people are talking about that, I don't think I'm needed. Damotclese (talk) 16:56, 22 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Comedy of the commons

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Comedy of the commons. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 February 2016 (UTC) The RFC is not well done, the commentary by other editors is not very civil. I'll not bother. Damotclese (talk) 16:44, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Man Who Sold the World (album)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Man Who Sold the World (album). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 28 February 2016 (UTC) Enough editors have commented, I do not need to. Damotclese (talk) 20:25, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Economy, trade, and companies

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Economy, trade, and companies. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 2 March 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. It's rare for me to get annoyed at an editor however I find that the need for this RFC is not valid, one of the editors obviously has some ideological reason for excluding a school from a list of accreditation and has not offered any valid reasons for doing so. Waste of time, editors shouldn't be engaged in petty reverting of other volunteer's valuable time and efforts. Damotclese (talk) 17:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:PBB

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:PBB. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 5 March 2016 (UTC) I don't know enough about this to comment thoughtfully. Damotclese (talk) 16:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Penny

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Penny. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 9 March 2016 (UTC) I will not comment on this one. Damotclese (talk) 16:12, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Always and for Real

I invite you to join in AFD discussion. --George Ho (talk) 20:31, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Unique Identification Authority of India

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Unique Identification Authority of India. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "European Graduate School article content - Accreditation issue". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 19 March 2016.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 07:49, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning European Graduate School article content - Accreditation issue, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 07:48, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

LOL! I don't doubt it. I already covered this issue repeatedly, the offending editor needs to be banned. Damotclese (talk) 19:36, 12 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 U.S.–Iran naval incident. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC) This should be a no-brainer. I commented on this. The information being discussed is encyclopedic and news-worthy, and researchers should not be looking everywhere else for information that should be included in this volunteer encyclopedia. More information is better than less and so far as I could tell, the opposition to including the information was ideological, not encyclopedic. Damotclese (talk) 16:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Wik-Ed Women Session #5

Wik-Ed Women Session #5

Dear fellow Wikipedian, I would like to personally invite you to the March edition of the Wik-Ed Women meetup, which will take place on March 15, from 6-10 in the evening. It will occur at Los Angeles Contemporary Archive, 2245 E Washington Blvd, Los Angeles, California 90021 (downtown LA -- map). The building has a pink top with old signage for American Accessories, Inc. dba Princess Accessories (Photos [PDF]). There is on-site parking in the back, which also has an entrance. If you cannot attend in person, you are more than willing to work remotely, as we appreciate all help that you can provide. Finally, here is a link to the Facebook event, in case you want to invite friends, as we are always looking for new editors to help expand coverage of women on Wikipedia! I hope to see you there! Cosmicphantom (talk) - via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:54, 15 March 2016 (UTC) Join our Facebook group here! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Well, I missed this. :) I was in the mountains hiking. Damotclese (talk) 16:47, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Marco Rubio

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Marco Rubio. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC) Enough editors have commented so I will not. Damotclese (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 21 March 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. The actual proposed text can be worded better however the proposed text context is appropriate. Damotclese (talk) 16:33, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Category talk:Fair use in... images

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Category talk:Fair use in... images. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 24 March 2016 (UTC) I don't have time to look at this. Damotclese (talk) 23:36, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Chrysler

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Chrysler. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 28 March 2016 (UTC) I commented., This is a no-brainer, the company is being described in the article, not the cars that it produces. Damotclese (talk) 16:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Is R2-45 about shooting someone?

Hi Damotclese, you might find Talk:R2-45#Facts_versus_conjecture interesting. --Slashme (talk) 11:20, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Thank you. Yes indeed this is an interesting subject, and I'm someone surprised that an editor feels that the policy is not firmly established as a real one. Interesting. I commented on this. Damotclese (talk) 14:35, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Real Robot

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Real Robot. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC) I have no idea what a Real Robet is. :) But enough editors have commented that I do not need to. Damotclese (talk) 16:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article titles. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Enough editors have commented on this so I do not need to. Damotclese (talk) 15:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Music. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 6 April 2016 (UTC) Enough editors have responded. Damotclese (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

R2-45

We cannot use a primary source to establish a controversial claim. The note in your revert is WP:OR. Grammar'sLittleHelper (talk) 16:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 April 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. The Wall Street employment of Hillary Clinton has been a major aspect of her campaign so there seems to be no legitimate reason not to cover the facts of her campaign, even those that Wall Street entities would wish to scrub from Wikipedia. Damotclese (talk) 16:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. Bitcoin is not a Ponzi-like scheme, it is not criminal nor abusive of gullible people in the classic sense of Ponzi which is a specific legal concept not contained within Bitcoin. Damotclese (talk) 15:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi, at Talk:Bitcoin you wrote: "At core Bitcoin was basically people buying, selling, and trading a collectible -- like bottle caps." - Thank you for your comment. I think that there are surprisingly few people who know this. Ladislav Mecir (talk) 16:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:My Old Kentucky Home

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:My Old Kentucky Home. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC) It looks like this has been resolved. Damotclese (talk) 15:42, 18 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Biodynamic agriculture

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Biodynamic agriculture. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 19 April 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. The rFC is not done very well. :) Damotclese (talk) 15:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Scientology issues

Hi Damotclese,

I've sent you an email via the "Email this user" link. Please let me know if you didn't get it. --Slashme (talk) 08:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 April 2016 (UTC) I'm late to this discussion but enough Editors either have or will respond, I will not. Damotclese (talk) 19:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2016 Stanley Cup playoffs

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2016 Stanley Cup playoffs. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 April 2016 (UTC) I will not respond to this one. Damotclese (talk) 15:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Need help

We need more neutral opinions here. I've followed instructions here and at Wikipedia:Feedback request service and to used the user lists there. I've sent a message for neutral input to everyone active recently and available for 10 per month or more on the lists in the Language and linguistics, Media, the arts, and architecture, Society-sports-culture, Unsorted and All-RFCs lists, none of whom have interacted with me before, that I can remember. Have done my best to act in good faith to try to get more neutral opinions. Please help! Thanx! SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:40, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

I commented on this. The issue is at core whether mime and pantomime should be covered in the same page together with British and American pantomime. At core it's a question of how many links a researcher must click on to find and print out or cut-and-paste from one or more pages. Damotclese (talk) 15:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:John Carter (film)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:John Carter (film). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 29 April 2016 (UTC) I'm not sure I have an opinion on this, however it looks like there is no concensus yet by the editors who have commented. I won't comment. Damotclese (talk) 15:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Top Model (Scandinavia)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Top Model (Scandinavia). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 May 2016 (UTC) I looked at this and commented. both tables look fine however the second table provides more information at a glance, and I think that offering more information is better than less. Damotclese (talk) 15:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

ANI Question

I have no idea what that is and don't have time. Damotclese (talk) 16:02, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of films considered the best

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:List of films considered the best. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 5 May 2016 (UTC) I don't have time to look at this. Damotclese (talk) 16:03, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Template messages/User talk namespace. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 8 May 2016 (UTC) I think enough editors havce commente don this. Damotclese (talk) 15:25, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kosher tax (antisemitic canard)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kosher tax (antisemitic canard). Legobot (talk) 04:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC) Ha! Enough people have commented. I never heard of this. Damotclese (talk) 15:11, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Anarchism sidebar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Anarchism sidebar. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 15 May 2016 (UTC) I commented on this, it makes sense to add it. Damotclese (talk) 16:47, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Locomotion in Mongol Outbacks

The company you work for has been in Choibalsan this past year. Do you know whether the local health authorities have policies and practices in place to address Brucellosis and Tuberculosis among the major cities carried in by ground transport from outlaying townships?

Actually would you care to submit a note to USAMRIID, CDC, or WHO through your company's legal people? BiologistBabe (talk) 17:00, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Welcome back! I heard your group had another fatality. EMail me with the latest body count, if you're allowed to.

The person you should talk to us [[1]] but you will almost certainly find that the local health agencies have their own methods and the ground transport infrastructure takes all of their direction from them. Damotclese (talk) 17:14, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

The mortality rate for their group is very, very low compared to other international organizations. TrainsOnTime (talk) 22:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:1982 in film

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:1982 in film. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC) I do not have time for this one. Damotclese (talk) 19:25, 19 May 2016 (UTC)

Talk:1982 in film

I see three editors have suggested commentary on this which are all in agreement, I don't believe I need to comment. Damotclese (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Ground transportation infectious diseases transport

Hey, see? I know BB would make it back alive. Sorry to hear one of her colleagues did not. BB, the company does follow the local and national rules and regulations established and we have offices which are specifically created to ensure that we do not spread diseases, must the way that Customs and Controls offices work. We ourselves to not propose any control measures or mitigating measures, we get the local agency documentation and open our transports up to their inspection schedules. TrainsOnTime (talk) 22:29, 20 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Internet fraud

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Internet fraud. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 22 May 2016 (UTC) This was interesting. However I doubt that anybody reading the article would use it for ideas on committing petty frauds on the Internet. Damotclese (talk) 15:50, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gary Cooper

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Gary Cooper. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC) Ha! I'm not going to dive in to this. Movie make-up. Damotclese (talk) 14:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Multi-sport event

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Multi-sport event. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 29 May 2016 (UTC) I don't think I'll look at this. Damotclese (talk) 17:03, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Caroline Overington

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Caroline Overington. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 1 June 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. The only concern is that WP:BLP be considered. Damotclese (talk) 16:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Rfd2

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Rfd2. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 4 June 2016 (UTC) Since I don't know anything about this I'll not comment. Enough editors have commented already. Damotclese (talk) 16:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC) I have no idea what they are talking about. :) Damotclese (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC) Strange. Damotclese (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:War & Peace (2016 TV series)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:War & Peace (2016 TV series). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC) I don't watch television. Damotclese (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Alfred North Whitehead

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Alfred North Whitehead. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. Damotclese (talk) 16:00, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Father Ted

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Father Ted. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC) I have no idea, however someone has pointed out that the nationality of where the show was produced is the correct answer. Damotclese (talk) 15:34, 20 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Economic growth

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Economic growth. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 June 2016 (UTC) I looked at this, the RFC was closed. Damotclese (talk) 15:48, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kodak Black

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kodak Black. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 June 2016 (UTC) The RFC is not worded properly however I commented. The person the article is about is not notable, he or she is a nobody so the article should be deleted. Damotclese (talk) 15:51, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been here a long time Damotclese so I'm surprised by your comment. This guy is well past the threshold of WP:notability. See Talk:Kodak_Black#Kodak_Black_--_notability_sources. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 17:19, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

As for the "not worded properly" issue, I went to the {{rfc}} template page which does not discuss wording, it just states that "This template should immediately precede the signed (or just dated) text of the request." If there is a problem with the wording then those instructions should be mentioned on the template page. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 17:27, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Um no, individuals with zero relevance and notoriety of any kind do not qualify to be included in encyclopedias, however it is understood that Wikipedia falls far short of being a professional encyclopedia, even zeros like this man or woman who nobody has ever heard of may be added by anybody. So my comment remains factual, the page qualifies for summary deletion -- though of course nobody cars enough to bother. And yeah, the RFC was not worded properly. Damotclese (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2016 (UTC)

Please point me to the Wikipedia policies for "relevance" and "notoriety" as they relate to inclusion of topics on Wikipedia? I found WP:Relevance and WP:ROC but they both deal with content within an article, not the main subject. I am using WP:Notability and WP:MUSICBIO as my criteria and an individual who has been written up in 6 major publications and described in them not just as "yet another rapper" but rather as an "artist to watch" and "shaping the future of pop" is well above the minimum threshold for the official WP policies I mentioned. Koala Tea Of Mercy (KTOM's Articulations & Invigilations) 15:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Wow, this person needs to go home to its mother and cry about it. Looking at the page I agree, the page should be deleted, it's just for some random guy who gave himself a fake name and then expects to pretend he's famous or something. BiologistBabe (talk) 15:26, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Ha! I know, the editor did not like the responses to the RFC and amusingly the "citations" that try to show that the nobody is somebody are laughingly pathetic. I'm more well known around the world and a Google search brings up over 300,000 pages that cover my law enforcement work and civil rights work, maybe I should create a page for myself, call myself "Green Kangaroo" and pretend I'm famous also. :) Damotclese (talk) 15:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

I saw that, should I comment on that page? If you Google that name, you find that the person isn't a celebrity or anything. It belongs in a local city page of notable people, perhaps, but the person is not legitimately notable.

By the way, I Googled your name and I find a third of a million pages with your name on them, and if I us your middle initial, I get half a million pages thanks to your web site and your organized crime work. So yeah, if that nobody can have a Wikipedia page, you certainly qualify ha ha. TrainsOnTime (talk) 20:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

No need, the page is not important, the clown editor not important. And yeah, I saw BB's Facebook posting about the google searching results -- hilarious but my main web site has half a million pages so it's not surprising. Damotclese (talk) 16:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Abusive editor on R2-45 was banned

That Scientology employee or whatever who was vandalizing and annoying R2-45 maintainer editors has been banned. I know you got tired of his/her shit and unwatched for the duration but the editor has been banned, you should watch again. TrainsOnTime (talk) 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Ah, thanks for confirmation, I'll do watchlist it again, BB posted something about that on Facebook yesterday as well but did not have details. I will check the talk: page on R2-45 and also the offending editor's talk: page.

It's ironic since the offending editor is a Scientology owner/operator/customer who attempted to remove the information about the criminal enterprise, harassed people to try to get them to be impolite and unprofessional so he/she could "Dev-T" their "buttons" and get them banned -- and the offending editor itself got banned. Classic. I assume that the page is semi-protected now as well. I'll go check. Damotclese (talk) 16:15, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Assurant

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Assurant. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 June 2016 (UTC) I commented on this, the court ruling should have higher weight than corporate media coverage however both references are legitimate and solid. Damotclese (talk) 15:14, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Led Zeppelin

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Led Zeppelin. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 3 July 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. At this time there's no good reason to include the unfounded allegations. If in the future the Judge or Jury rules against the band, then it would be appropriate to include. Damotclese (talk) 17:16, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Arbitration

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Scientology R2-45: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted in most arbitration pages please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use. Thanks, Grammar's Li'l Helper ^Talk 06:20, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

No he is not. No I am not. This is a Scientology agent that has been topic banned and yet here he is still trying to abuse and waste other people's time. So very typical of Scientology. BiologistBabe (talk) 17:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

It's what these Scientology owners/operators/customers call "Dev-T" -- "Develop traffic," they attempt to stop the truth about what the criminal enterprise does by flooding the truth with noise, wasting prosecutor's time, all of that. Damotclese (talk) 17:17, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:The Dark Side of the Moon. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 6 July 2016 (UTC) LOL! Hey now, the discussion in there is getting a little too exciting and hot for me to want to dive in with an opinion. :) Comments in there are amusing, made me smile. Still I don't know enough about the subject to comment reasonably so I will not. Damotclese (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Requesting feedback

Would you please check your email, I would like to see about creating a CTC page and would like to pass the initial draft through you. BiologistBabe (talk) 17:11, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, I got your email and it's true, we should maybe see if there's a broad page that you might consider creating which covers the entire PTC Class "C" and "D" functionality though you must be careful to avoid getting in to too much detail. You can see what other protocols look like and follow their example. Let me get something back to you on your submission. Damotclese (talk) 17:23, 6 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Hilton Worldwide

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Hilton Worldwide. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 10 July 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. The proposed external link and reference does not appear to be promotion or advertising, it looks reasonable. Damotclese (talk) 15:35, 11 July 2016 (UTC)

I adopted the text and reference. Damotclese (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox company

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox company. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC) I commented on this. I like the idea of having some auto conversion in a short table showing currency, but I suppose few other editors would like that. Damotclese (talk) 15:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Giving You the Best That I Got (album)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Giving You the Best That I Got (album). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 July 2016 (UTC) The discussion has been closed so I won't. Damotclese (talk) 15:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:29, 19 July 2016 (UTC) Lots of people commented on this so I will not. I like the "packed" version better. Damotclese (talk) 15:19, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Philippines v. China

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Philippines v. China. Legobot (talk) 04:23, 23 July 2016 (UTC) I commented on this however the RFC does not state a question or an issue that needs commentary. I asked that they rework the RFC. Damotclese (talk) 18:37, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Truck

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Truck. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 July 2016 (UTC) I responded. Damotclese (talk) 15:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Moderators/Straw poll

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Moderators/Straw poll. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 29 July 2016 (UTC) Many editors have commented on this so I will not. Damotclese (talk) 16:22, 29 July 2016 (UTC)