April 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hot Boyz (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Moocha (talk) 18:03, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. I suggest you do stuff like this again. Moocha (talk) 11:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

.

May 2011

edit
 

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Martin Luther King, Jr., did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, DCBotTrick, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. mechamind90 06:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

My name does not end with "bot" so it does not violate the username policy.DCBotTrick (talk) 14:17, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

"also, unless your account is an approved bot, your name should not end with "bot", which is used to identify bot accounts" My username ends with "Trick." You could also be reading the username wrong, ever think it's DCB-ot-Trick? I'm not a bot DCBotTrick (talk) 19:58, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to The Wash (film), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. E♴(talk) 17:38, 7 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent vandalism, and ignoring repeated warnings, the most recent violation being this edit to Roger Ebert. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:35, 13 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DCBotTrick (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Why was I blocked from editing? Give me examples, I'm an example kind of a person.DCBotTrick (talk) 20:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.