Dondria

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Dondria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ice Cold Beer (talk) 01:34, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Dondria

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Dondria, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Captain-tucker (talk) 02:12, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

August 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Dondria has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. CL02:13, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

April 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Fearless (Taylor Swift album), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Runefrost (talk) 05:31, 3 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

No mercy

edit

I will take down your article. It is not notable. Put that on a rap fansite not an encyclopedia. You should be disgusted at your "creation" and its coming demise. Big Brother of The Party (talk) 09:24, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please do not take the above rant as indicative of the level of politeness normally seen on Wikipedia. You'll note the editor who just said this is blocked for personal attacks. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 12:01, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Love Faces.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Love Faces.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 5 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Love Faces.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Love Faces.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:55, 19 December 2010 (UTC)Reply