Curbdog

List of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles characters

Hi. I see you added characters to the List of Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles characters. While we appreciate your help in building the page, you forgot to add them to the Table of appearances at the top of the page. Please do so in the future, otherwise the page will become unmanageable. Thank you. -- Ritchy 23:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

No need for duplicate articles

Hi. I noticed you created an article at C.O.W.-Boys of Moo Mesa which was a direct copy of the opening paragraph of the existing article at Wild West C.O.W.-Boys of Moo Mesa, so I changed it to a redirect. It is standard procedure on Wikipedia not to have duplicate articles on the same subject (otherwise the edits would get out of sync), so redirects are used to redirect people from, for example, shorter titles to the correct article with the full title. I also noticed you tried to revert my changing the article into a redirect, which is not the right thing to do. If you have any additions or changes you wish to make, you need to do it to the main article itself (Wild West C.O.W.-Boys of Moo Mesa), not the redirect page. Thank you. ~Matticus ^T_C 22:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Tales21moomesa.jpg)

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tales21moomesa.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BigDT 03:13, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Hallowieners

Please note that article that do not assert the notability of their subjects may be deleted, per policy. Thus, I deleted the Hallowieners article that you created. If you feel that the subject is notable, let me know, and I would be happy to discuss it, and possibly undelete the article. -- Where 02:03, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Nova Posse

Nova Posse, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Nova Posse satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nova Posse and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Nova Posse during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Wizardman 19:24, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Scratch (TMNT)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Scratch (TMNT), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Scratch (TMNT). Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Motorhead (TMNT)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Motorhead (TMNT), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Motorhead (TMNT). Judgesurreal777 (talk) 03:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Curbdog! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 905 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Stephen Murphy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Michael Dooney - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:25, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Gutwallow

The article Gutwallow has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 14:16, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dan Berger

A tag has been placed on Dan Berger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

WP:CSD#A7 No evidence of notability, sole source is primary (WP:OR).

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Guy (Help!) 00:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dan Berger

The article Dan Berger has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject's notability is dubious. Work as an artist on TMNT, but not any other claim to significance. Fails WP:CREATIVE and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 02:17, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Dan Berger for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dan Berger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dan Berger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Safiel (talk) 15:06, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)