I love you , Cubbi PCrew00 08:38, 26 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Meow ♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥ slurp me! 11:14, 5 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

In soviet russia, and wikipedia, Minestrone soup thanks you! ♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥ slurp me! 23:46, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply


The Yellow Sign Said edit

There is a bunch of junk here that is a waste of space, and really not worth having there, I agree with the yellow sign... please revert to the short and simple version with the internal link to Marathon.

Also, there are translated copies of the DVD circulated in America: the title is Run Lola (there is no extra Run on the end).

I hold a bachelor's degree in Arts, I graduated with a 3.52 from North Park University and I was raised in the presence of German speaking great-grandparents. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.99.1.84 (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Use the talk page of the article in question to discuss major content changes. --Cubbi (talk) 23:58, 16 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Out of interest, what were the full names of Lux-Flood? edit

I'm just curious as to what their full names were.. i've not been able to find their entire names anywhere!   ♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥ slurp me! 22:28, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am sure we can do it with some more searching! Cubbi 22:41, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
I've tried a list of 60 German male names beginning with H, and affixed it to "Chemist <name> Lux" and "<name> Lux", and have yet to come up with a convincing enough result.. HERMANN LUX seems to be the closest.   ♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥ slurp me! 23:03, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Bingo, i have it;
Hermann Lux, “‘Acids’ and ‘Bases’ in a Fused Salt Bath;. Determination. of. Oxygen-Ion Concentrations,” Z. Elektrochem.,. 45303-309 (1939). Here   ♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥ slurp me! 23:05, 13 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Feel like working on Hydrocarbon today? edit

I'd like to sort the article out, as it's a pretty important part of organic chemistry, and since we're both OC majors, i thought we'd collaborate on the article!   ♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥ slurp me! 07:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maybe, depends on time. And, btw, I don't like your latest definition there, hydrocarbons still has to be defined as 'carbon and hydrogen only', rather than 'alkanes, alkenes, alkynes, etc' Cubbi 20:56, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
Hmm, i was trying to expand it to the somewhat "impure" alkanes, with nitrogen impurities, etc. Still, i agree -- i'll change it.   ♥♥ ΜÏΠЄSΓRΘΠ€ ♥♥ slurp me! 20:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Could you help me write this article? edit

Hello,

I was wondering if you would be willing to help me write either Seikichi_Iha or Shorin-ryu_Shido-kan. Tkjazzer 21:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not likely. I've only been in Shito-kai Shito-ryu, Seishinkai, and Shukokai, so I don't have any serious knowledge of other styles. Cubbi 10:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Furry edit

Looking for something to do? WikiProject Furry is improving articles on furry and anthropomorphic topics, and we'd like to have you on board.

Our current goal is to raise Anthrocon, furry convention and furry fandom to good article status and beyond - but if that doesn't take your fancy, there are plenty of other articles to work on. Give it a go and let us know how you're doing!

You received this one-time invitation because you are a Furry Wikipedian. GreenReaper 22:36, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

~7~CyanFOX~7~ 14:26, 21 January 2008 (UTC) Wuz here :3 I luff you Cubbi —Preceding unsigned comment added by ~7~CyanFOX~7~ (talkcontribs)

ru.wikifur.com edit

Привет, хотелось бы услышать ваше мнение по поводу статьи Adriannicolas.byethost18.com на странице обсуждения http://ru.wikifur.com/wiki/Adriannicolas.byethost18.com 66.119.55.14 (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Water memory edit

Please don't revert the removal of unsourced material and categories without providing adequate sources; it is not constructive. There is no indication that the ideology of Water memory is pseudoscience. --BETA 14:16, 2 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for making me laugh. --Cubbi (talk) 06:42, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Tōon-ryū edit

I have nominated Tōon-ryū, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tōon-ryū. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters(Broken clamshellsOtter chirps) 02:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Torsion field edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Torsion field, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torsion field. Thank you. Silly rabbit (talk) 02:43, 8 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dream edit

Hi,

Note that you have twice reverted to a versino of Dream which contains the phrase 'banging Jesica Alba', a version which, at least, could be more generic and in keeping with WP:TONE. I've reverted, and I don't really consider the 'banging Jesica Alba' version to add sufficient merit to retain the phrase. WLU (talk) 19:03, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oops, sorry about that. Thank for catching it. --Cubbi (talk) 19:08, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Not like I haven't done so myself, happy editing. WLU (talk) 19:18, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Warning edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Karate, you will be blocked from editing. The removal of sourced information, which has been long requested on the talk page. 220.253.13.106 (talk) 22:18, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Very funny. Since you don't read Talk:Karate I did you a favor and moved your addition to the appropriate section of the article. --Cubbi (talk) 10:41, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Martial Arts edit

I know you're intentions in undoing my edit to Martial Arts are good, but the correct grammar would be "makes." The verb "makes" in that sentence is the action that "each style" (singular) takes. It it not describing the action of "facets" (plural).

The facets aren't different than other martial arts, each style is. - Charleca (talk) 13:39, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

You are incorrect. The sentence in question "While each style has unique facets that make(s) it different from other martial arts, a common characteristic is the systemization of fighting techniques", has the subject "style", the verb "has", and the direct object "unique facets". The direct object is clarified by a clause, in which "facets" is the subject, "make different" is the verb, and "it" is the object. --Cubbi (talk) 13:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I can see how you might think that. But I am not the one that is incorrect here. This is one of those sentences that has multiple verbs and can be somewhat difficult to break apart. The way you want to word it says the facets are different from other martial arts. The facets make each style different; the facets themselves are not different than other martial arts. I would be OK with rewording the sentence, but "make" is incorrect in the form that it's in now. - Charleca (talk) 14:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have no difficulty reading a simple SVO clause with one subordinate restrictive relative clause, I honestly fail to understand how can you see that "facets" clause as coordinated independent (which is what your conclusion suggests). Could it be that the "while" is throwing you off? Stripped of the extra luggage, the main two clauses read Each style has facets that make(s) it different from other MAs. Is this more clear?
What I do agree, though, is that the latter half of the sentence (after comma) is poorly coordinated with its beginning and the sentence is needlessly complex for the simple thought. --Cubbi (talk) 14:21, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes. Let's come up with an acceptable rewording. I don't want to get into the "right/wrong" fighting arena. -Charleca (talk) 14:33, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
You're right. I totally missed the word "while" in the sentence - oversight on my part. I've changed it back to "make." -Charleca (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Oh wow, very few people concede their points. It's still an oddly complicated sentence, though. --Cubbi (talk) 14:38, 8 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Great reference edit

Great reference in the Fistfight article, thank you! Kostan1 (talk) 12:13, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're no fun.

-false awakening guy

Water edit

Yeah ok that delete of water freezing was such a dumb thing to do. If you didn't agree with the new section because of existing information, delete the information and add onto the new section! a school student wants to navigate right to the why's and how's, not scroll through an already fragmented page.

I suggest you undo that edit and do what i suggested.Destroyer000 (talk) 11:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

I suggest that you read articles before editing. --Cubbi (talk) 13:35, 3 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
I *did* read it. The information on hydrogen bonds were related to another topic.Destroyer000 (talk) 02:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
If you read it, why did you create a duplicate subsection? As for "a school student wants...", WP:NOTTEXTBOOK --Cubbi (talk) 03:36, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yeah ok but all I'm saying is it needs to be explained better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Destroyer000 (talkcontribs) 07:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

More of you edit

You're actually a good editor. I have read you UBX and agree with the vast majority of them. Let us put that water and freezing incident behind us :D Destroyer000 (talk) 11:26, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hah, looks like I've inadvertently introduced you to the world of userboxes. No hard feelings, you acted on good intentions. --Cubbi (talk) 15:29, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Torsion field for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Torsion field, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Torsion field until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Stifle (talk) 13:53, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

torsion field article is your fraud edit

Please go and remove your pseudoscience label, nobody is agree with your opinion, errors and mistakes, torsion field article has no reliable links to sustain pseudoscience concept(non-neutral point of view). If you dont do that your username will be erased by wikipedia administrators due to not respecting Wikipedia Rules. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Torsionfield (talkcontribs) 16:24, 24 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

About Lenin edit

Hi! I wanted to let you know that there is currently an ongoing discussion about the inclusion of Lenin in the mosaic of Russians. Since you participated in the previous discussion two years ago, I thought you may be interested in the current one. Please participate if this issue at all interests you. If you know of anyone who may be interested, please ask them to join us as well. I would really like to settle this issue once and for all. Thanks! --Eightofnine (talk) 00:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

И верно говорили о Ленине, "живее всех живых" --Cubbi (talk) 04:14, 18 April 2012 (UTC)Reply


Greetings, I've noticed your interest in articles relating to C/C++ and would like to invite you to join the WikiProject C/C++, a group of Wikipedians devoted to improving articles related to C and C++. If you're interested, please consider adding yourself to the list of participants and joining the discussion on the talkpage. --—Sowlos

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 26 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited C file input/output, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page C11. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 26 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for January 17 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited ANSI C, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gets. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016 edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Alkyl may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Alan|last=Rocke|publisher=Springer|date=2012|isbn=978-3-642-27415-2|page=62|quote=Ethyl radicals (named by Liebig in 1833 from the Greek and German word "aether" plus Greek "hyle"}}</ref>. This was
  • roots, by Dumas and Peligot in 1834: methyl = methy + hyle ("spirit" + "wood")}}</ref>) and amyl (Auguste Cahours in 1840, "substance of potato"<ref>{{cite book|title=From the Molecular World: A

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ryūei-ryū edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ryūei-ryū requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://karatedo.hakuakai-matsubushidojo.com/Nahate.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:13, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge edit

  You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open! edit

Hello, Cubbi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Cubbi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Cubbi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Cubbi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Seishinkai edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Seishinkai requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mountaincirquetalk 13:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply