User talk:CrazyChemGuy/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello CrazyChemGuy! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting "adopted" by an experienced user How to: edit a page • upload and use images • start an article Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

User community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Gogo Dodo 23:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

From Kanchanamala

CrazyChemGuy, please don't get carried away by the freedoms given by Wikipedia to revert edits in the article on Bangalore. After all, LoneWolfBC does not own that article. Thanks.Kanchanamala 06:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

The edit I reverted([1]) was blatant vandalism. My revert had nothing to do with any differences in opinion you and LoneWolfBC might have about what belongs in the article. CrazyChemGuy 18:47, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

CCG, I respect you for the information. Thanks.Kanchanamala 02:38, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

From Mark Dittmer, re: Gary Radnich

You undid my recent edit, and re-inserted a link on the Gary Radnich page that essentially exists only to insinuate he is a racist.

There is no factual support for this insinuation. There is no arguing that the link (to an article by Art Spander about a controversy that surrounded KNBR talk show host Larry Krueger) is not primarily about Gary Radnich, and only mentions him tangentially. Therefore, the only reason it's been linked here is to insinuate that Radnich is a racist, and there is no factual support for such an insinuation.

The link has not been edited to consensus. indeed, there is little support on the discussion page for inclusion of this link.

The introductory paragraph at the beginning of the "Reactions" section is not very important. But this Spander link, introduced in the text as "Art Spander panned Radnich for his support of Larry Krueger's racist comments," is inflammatory and so misleading as to take away from the integrity of wikipedia. In is essentially vandalism. I don't see how you can support it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark dittmer (talk • contribs) 00:48, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

P.S.

I see from visiting my own talk page and that of another contributor to the Radnich page that you are in a way working to mediate this. However, the fact is that in this case the other guy is totally out in left field, and a compromise that allows that link to remain in the Radnich stub is not an acceptable compromise.

I am not questioning Art Spander's credentials, but here he is being blatantly misrepresented. The article cited is not reaction to Radnich but rather reaction to a controversy involving one of Radnich's colleagues. The controversy itself is dealt with more appropriately on Larry Krueger's page (the columnist who actually got in hot water), and this article is nowhere linked on that page.

Sorry, I'm repeating myself. Please reconsider your recent changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark dittmer (talk • contribs) 01:18, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

From Mark Dittmer

Link to your recent edits regarding Gary Radnich.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gary_Radnich&action=history

Sorry. I got mixed up looking at the history. You didn't undo my edits, rather you undid the edits of the guy who undid them. Thanks for that. I'll try talking to the right person. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark dittmer (talk • contribs) 16:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Alexf

Thanks for being alert and reverting vandalism on my pages. Alexf^{(Talk/Contribs)} 01:45, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Pharmacology Update

Here are a few updates in the realm of WikiProject Pharmacology:

• The Pharmacology Collaboration of the Week has been changed to Collaboration of the Month, based on current participation levels. It is also more likely that articles collaborated on for one month are more likely to achieve featured quality than articles worked on for only a week or two.

• The current Collaboration of the Month for November is Receptor antagonist. Please take a look at that article and contribute to it if you get a chance. Ideally, the article should adhere to the featured article criteria.

• Therapies for multiple sclerosis is currently a featured article candidate. If you are familiar with the featured article criteria, please visit WP:FAC and review the article.

• Anabolic steroid is the wikiproject's newest Featured Article, having been promoted on October 8, 2007.

• Theobromine was delisted as a Good Article. The Peer review and GA reassessment discussions provide suggestions on improvement. Muscle relaxant was recently reviewed for Good Article status, but not promoted. Please see the full review full review here for details.

Dr. Cash 22:07, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Nice job on calcium chromate

Nice job on the calcium chromate article... really useful stuff that chemistry is.Jsmith86 (talk) 22:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback can only be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you do not want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message on my talk page. Happy editing! Malinaccier (talk) 00:10, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

thanks for the shiny!

Thanks, Huggle is really fast. Also, you may not realize it, but you have beat me quite a few times too, so

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		Thanks for helping to keep Wikipedia the best encyclopedia in the world. J.delanoygabsadds 22:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for helping me keep my talkpage clean and for the reverting of numerous personal attacks! Fattyjwoods (Push my button) 00:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

I see you had quite a bit of trouble from 24.18.187.21| like me eh? :) Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 00:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)